mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Non-instructional Fine-tuning: Enabling Instruction-Following Capabilities in Pre-trained Language Models without Instruction-Following Data

arXiv 2409.00096 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction fine-tuning is crucial for today's large language models (LLMs) to learn to follow instructions and align with human preferences. Conventionally, supervised data, including the instruction and the correct response, is required for instruction fine-tuning. To obtain such data, some researchers prompted well-trained models like GPT-4 to generate instructions and correct responses. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that uses the first half of a random text from OpenWebText as the instruction and GPT-3.5-turbo or GPT-4-turbo to complete the text as the response. Despite the data being "non-instructional", we found that pre-trained LLMs fine-tuned on this data can gain instruction-following capabilities. This observation is verified by fine-tuning several well-known pre-trained LLMs (e.g., LLaMA-2-7B, LLaMA-3-8B, LLaMA-3-70B, Mistral-7B-v0.1). The "non-instructional data" also improved some models that underwent supervised fine-tuning and human preference alignment. Our LLaMA-3-70B-Instruct fine-tuned through "non-instructional data" is comparable with LLaMA-3.1-70B-Instruct on the Arena Hard leaderboard. We analyzed the "non-instructional data" and ensured it is devoid of content related to instruction fine-tuning. Our findings will inspire further investigation into how to develop instruction-following capabilities without explicit instruction-related data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2024.

Builds on

11 of 33 references.

References · 11

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  3. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  4. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  5. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  6. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
  7. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
  8. 2024Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothingcited by 341
  9. 2023ChatIE: Zero-Shot Information Extraction via Chatting with ChatGPTcited by 250
  10. 2023Evaluating ChatGPT's Information Extraction Capabilities: An Assessment of Performance, Explainability, Calibration, and Faithfulnesscited by 130
  11. 2023An Empirical Study of Instruction-tuning Large Language Models in Chinesecited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4
  2. 2025Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training
  3. 2024Enhancing and Assessing Instruction-Following with Fine-Grained Instruction Variants
  4. 2026FineInstructions: Scaling Synthetic Instructions to Pre-Training Scale
  5. 2023Tuna: Instruction Tuning using Feedback from Large Language Models
  6. 2023Becoming self-instruct: introducing early stopping criteria for minimal instruct tuning
  7. 2025Cream of the Crop: Harvesting Rich, Scalable and Transferable Multi-Modal Data for Instruction Fine-Tuning
  8. 2024Diverse and Fine-Grained Instruction-Following Ability Exploration with Synthetic Data