Diverse and Fine-Grained Instruction-Following Ability Exploration with Synthetic Data
On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Code and instruction data synthesis
Abstract (arXiv)
Instruction-following is particularly crucial for large language models (LLMs) to support diverse user requests. While existing work has made progress in aligning LLMs with human preferences, evaluating their capabilities on instruction following remains a challenge due to complexity and diversity of real-world user instructions. While existing evaluation methods focus on general skills, they suffer from two main shortcomings, i.e., lack of fine-grained task-level evaluation and reliance on singular instruction expression. To address these problems, this paper introduces DINGO, a fine-grained and diverse instruction-following evaluation dataset that has two main advantages: (1) DINGO is based on a manual annotated, fine-grained and multi-level category tree with 130 nodes derived from real-world user requests; (2) DINGO includes diverse instructions, generated by both GPT-4 and human experts. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that DINGO can not only provide more challenging and comprehensive evaluation for LLMs, but also provide task-level fine-grained directions to further improve LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Code and instruction data synthesis, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 17 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2024.
Builds on
17 of 22 references.
References · 17
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,202
- 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 748
- 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 743
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
5 more
- 2020Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Alternate Meta-learningcited by 216
- 2023FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill Setscited by 201
- 2023ProofNet: Autoformalizing and Formally Proving Undergraduate-Level Mathematicscited by 192
- 2021Reframing Human-AI Collaboration for Generating Free-Text Explanationscited by 125
- 2023Distilling Script Knowledge from Large Language Models for Constrained Language Planningcited by 45
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023FollowEval: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Assessing the Instruction-Following Capability of Large Language Models
- 2024Enhancing and Assessing Instruction-Following with Fine-Grained Instruction Variants
- 2025Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training
- 2026IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation
- 2025WangchanThaiInstruct: An instruction-following Dataset for Culture-Aware, Multitask, and Multi-domain Evaluation in Thai
- 2023A Preliminary Study of the Intrinsic Relationship between Complexity and Alignment
- 2025The Instruction Gap: LLMs get lost in Following Instruction
- 2024A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following