mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cream of the Crop: Harvesting Rich, Scalable and Transferable Multi-Modal Data for Instruction Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2503.13383 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The hypothesis that pretrained large language models (LLMs) necessitate only minimal supervision during the fine-tuning (SFT) stage (Zhou et al., 2024) has been substantiated by recent advancements in data curation and selection research. However, their stability and generalizability are compromised due to the vulnerability to experimental setups and validation protocols, falling short of surpassing random sampling (Diddee & Ippolito, 2024; Xia et al., 2024b). Built upon LLMs, multi-modal LLMs (MLLMs), combined with the sheer token volume and heightened heterogeneity of data sources, amplify both the significance and complexity of data selection. To harvest multi-modal instructional data in a robust and efficient manner, we re-define the granularity of the quality metric by decomposing it into 14 vision-language-related capabilities, and introduce multi-modal rich scorers to evaluate the capabilities of each data candidate. To promote diversity, in light of the inherent objective of the alignment stage, we take interaction style as diversity indicator and use a multi-modal rich styler to identify data instruction patterns. In doing so, our multi-modal rich scorers and styler (mmSSR) guarantee that high-scoring information is conveyed to users in diversified forms. Free from embedding-based clustering or greedy sampling, mmSSR efficiently scales to millions of data with varying budget constraints, supports customization for general or specific capability acquisition, and facilitates training-free generalization to new domains for curation. Across 10+ experimental settings, validated by 14 multi-modal benchmarks, we demonstrate consistent improvements over random sampling, baseline strategies and state-of-the-art selection methods, achieving 99.1% of full performance with only 30% of the 2.6M data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2025.

Builds on

48 of 61 references.

References · 48

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  5. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  6. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  7. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  8. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,719
  9. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
  10. 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,080
  11. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  12. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
36 more
  1. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,652
  2. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,479
  3. 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,317
  4. 2023ShareGPT4V: Improving Large Multi-Modal Models with Better Captionscited by 1,005
  5. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
  6. 2016A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Imagescited by 804
  7. 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 763
  8. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
  9. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
  10. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
  11. 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 550
  12. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
  13. 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 455
  14. 2021InfographicVQAcited by 437
  15. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 364
  16. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
  17. 2024MMT-Bench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models Towards Multitask AGIcited by 193
  18. 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 157
  19. 2023What's In My Big Data?cited by 129
  20. 2024E5-V: Universal Embeddings with Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 126
  21. 2024Mono-InternVL: Pushing the Boundaries of Monolithic Multimodal Large Language Models with Endogenous Visual Pre-trainingcited by 82
  22. 2024Scaling Laws for Data Filtering -- Data Curation cannot be Compute Agnosticcited by 77
  23. 2024Vision-Flan: Scaling Human-Labeled Tasks in Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 73
  24. 2020Towards Robust and Reproducible Active Learning Using Neural Networkscited by 54
  25. 2023Dataset Quantizationcited by 48
  26. 2023Rethinking the Instruction Quality: LIFT is What You Needcited by 34
  27. 2024SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-Reflectioncited by 34
  28. 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Modelscited by 29
  29. 2023Bad Students Make Great Teachers: Active Learning Accelerates Large-Scale Visual Understandingcited by 28
  30. 2024Concept-skill Transferability-based Data Selection for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 24
  31. 2024Rethinking Data Selection at Scale: Random Selection is Almost All You Needcited by 22
  32. 2025Metadata Conditioning Accelerates Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 22
  33. 2023Box-Level Active Detectioncited by 13
  34. 2024Chasing Random: Instruction Selection Strategies Fail to Generalizecited by 13
  35. 2024PrefixKV: Adaptive Prefix KV Cache is What Vision Instruction-Following Models Need for Efficient Generationcited by 13
  36. 2024Learn from the Learnt: Source-Free Active Domain Adaptation via Contrastive Sampling and Visual Persistencecited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Mastering Collaborative Multi-modal Data Selection: A Focus on Informativeness, Uniqueness, and Representativeness
  2. 2023Vision-Language Instruction Tuning: A Review and Analysis
  3. 2025Visual Compositional Tuning
  4. 2024Enhancing and Assessing Instruction-Following with Fine-Grained Instruction Variants
  5. 2024Curriculum Learning with Quality-Driven Data Selection
  6. 2023Unlock the Power: Competitive Distillation for Multi-Modal Large Language Models
  7. 2024MLAN: Language-Based Instruction Tuning Preserves and Transfers Knowledge in Multimodal Language Models
  8. 2024Adapt-∞: Scalable Continual Multimodal Instruction Tuning via Dynamic Data Selection