Optimally Solving Simultaneous-Move Dec-POMDPs: The Sequential Central Planning Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The centralized training for decentralized execution paradigm emerged as the state-of-the-art approach to ε-optimally solving decentralized partially observable Markov decision processes. However, scalability remains a significant issue. This paper presents a novel and more scalable alternative, namely the sequential-move centralized training for decentralized execution. This paradigm further pushes the applicability of the Bellman's principle of optimality, raising three new properties. First, it allows a central planner to reason upon sufficient sequential-move statistics instead of prior simultaneous-move ones. Next, it proves that ε-optimal value functions are piecewise linear and convex in such sufficient sequential-move statistics. Finally, it drops the complexity of the backup operators from double exponential to polynomial at the expense of longer planning horizons. Besides, it makes it easy to use single-agent methods, e.g., SARSA algorithm enhanced with these findings, while still preserving convergence guarantees. Experiments on two- as well as many-agent domains from the literature against ε-optimal simultaneous-move solvers confirm the superiority of our novel approach. This paradigm opens the door for efficient planning and reinforcement learning methods for multi-agent systems.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2024.
Builds on
12 of 33 references.
References · 12
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 751
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 708
- 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 379
- 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 270
- 2013The Complexity of Decentralized Control of Markov Decision Processescited by 231
- 2019MAVEN: Multi-Agent Variational Explorationcited by 185
- 2021Shapley Counterfactual Credits for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 38
- 2019Rethinking Formal Models of Partially Observable Multiagent Decision Makingcited by 36
- 2021Solving Common-Payoff Games with Approximate Policy Iterationcited by 15
- 2020Multiagent Value Iteration Algorithms in Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2014Incremental Clustering and Expansion for Faster Optimal Planning in Dec-POMDPscited by 2
- 2024Solving Hierarchical Information-Sharing Dec-POMDPs: An Extensive-Form Game Approachcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2018Hindsight is Only 50/50: Unsuitability of MDP based Approximate POMDP Solvers for Multi-resolution Information Gathering
- 2025Sequential Monte Carlo for Policy Optimization in Continuous POMDPs
- 2024Deterministic Policy Gradient Primal-Dual Methods for Continuous-Space Constrained MDPs
- 2026End-to-End Efficient RL for Linear Bellman Complete MDPs with Deterministic Transitions
- 2024Operator Splitting for Convex Constrained Markov Decision Processes
- 2024Computationally Efficient RL under Linear Bellman Completeness for Deterministic Dynamics
- 2026Reinforcement Learning under State and Outcome Uncertainty: A Foundational Distributional Perspective
- 2026Mathematical methods of reinforcement learning