Toward the Evaluation of Large Language Models Considering Score Variance across Instruction Templates
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The natural language understanding (NLU) performance of large language models (LLMs) has been evaluated across various tasks and datasets. The existing evaluation methods, however, do not take into account the variance in scores due to differences in prompts, which leads to unfair evaluation and comparison of NLU performance. Moreover, evaluation designed for specific prompts is inappropriate for instruction tuning, which aims to perform well with any prompt. It is therefore necessary to find a way to measure NLU performance in a fair manner, considering score variance between different instruction templates. In this study, we provide English and Japanese cross-lingual datasets for evaluating the NLU performance of LLMs, which include multiple instruction templates for fair evaluation of each task, along with regular expressions to constrain the output format. Furthermore, we propose the Sharpe score as an evaluation metric that takes into account the variance in scores between templates. Comprehensive analysis of English and Japanese LLMs reveals that the high variance among templates has a significant impact on the fair evaluation of LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2024.
Builds on
47 of 82 references.
References · 47
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,502
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,492
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,876
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,880
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,348
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,133
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,765
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,388
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,949
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,676
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,805
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,785
35 more
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,725
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,376
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,281
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,126
- 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,120
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,054
- 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,031
- 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 957
- 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 896
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 867
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 797
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 736
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 731
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 717
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 705
- 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 654
- 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 630
- 2021Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 363
- 2023Trained Transformers Learn Linear Models In-Contextcited by 333
- 2022The case for 4-bit precision: k-bit Inference Scaling Lawscited by 249
- 2022ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question Answeringcited by 196
- 2023Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERTcited by 155
- 2020The Multilingual Amazon Reviews Corpuscited by 143
- 2023Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Language Models via Implicit Inferencecited by 141
- 2023Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluationcited by 134
- 2022WHEN FLUE MEETS FLANG: Benchmarks and Large Pre-trained Language Model for Financial Domaincited by 117
- 2023To Repeat or Not To Repeat: Insights from Scaling LLM under Token-Crisiscited by 91
- 2021Identifying and Mitigating Spurious Correlations for Improving Robustness in NLP Modelscited by 76
- 2023Large Language Models Can be Lazy Learners: Analyze Shortcuts in In-Context Learningcited by 69
- 2024Can multiple-choice questions really be useful in detecting the abilities of LLMs?cited by 69
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Forgetting in Deep Learning Beyond Continual Learningcited by 67
- 2023Do Emergent Abilities Exist in Quantized Large Language Models: An Empirical Studycited by 43
- 2023Flacuna: Unleashing the Problem Solving Power of Vicuna using FLAN Fine-Tuningcited by 18
- 2023JCoLA: Japanese Corpus of Linguistic Acceptabilitycited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024LIFBench: Evaluating the Instruction Following Performance and Stability of Large Language Models in Long-Context Scenarioscited by 32
- 2025Revisiting Compositional Generalization Capability of Large Language Models Considering Instruction Following Abilitycited by 10
- 2024Towards Cross-Lingual Explanation of Artwork in Large-scale Vision Language Modelscited by 7
- 2024BQA: Body Language Question Answering Dataset for Video Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2026Edit-level Majority Voting Mitigates Over-Correction in LLM-based Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 1
- 2026Revisiting Non-Verbatim Memorization in Large Language Models: The Role of Entity Surface Formscited by 0
- 2026Understanding Evaluation Illusion in Diffusion Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Understanding Evaluation Illusion in Diffusion Large Language Models28 Jun 2026
- 2026Edit-level Majority Voting Mitigates Over-Correction in LLM-based Grammatical Error Correction13 May 2026
- 2026Revisiting Non-Verbatim Memorization in Large Language Models: The Role of Entity Surface Forms23 Apr 2026
- 2025Revisiting Compositional Generalization Capability of Large Language Models Considering Instruction Following Ability18 Jun 2025
- 2024LIFBench: Evaluating the Instruction Following Performance and Stability of Large Language Models in Long-Context Scenarios11 Nov 2024
- 2024BQA: Body Language Question Answering Dataset for Video Large Language Models17 Oct 2024
- 2024Towards Cross-Lingual Explanation of Artwork in Large-scale Vision Language Models3 Sep 2024