mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisiting Non-Verbatim Memorization in Large Language Models: The Role of Entity Surface Forms

arXiv 2604.21882 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding what kinds of factual knowledge large language models (LLMs) memorize is essential for evaluating their reliability and limitations. Entity-based QA is a common framework for analyzing non-verbatim memorization, but typical evaluations query each entity using a single canonical surface form, making it difficult to disentangle fact memorization from access through a particular name. We introduce RedirectQA, an entity-based QA dataset that uses Wikipedia redirect information to associate Wikidata factual triples with categorized surface forms for each entity, including alternative names, abbreviations, spelling variants, and common erroneous forms. Across 13 LLMs, we examine surface-conditioned factual memorization and find that prediction outcomes often change when only the entity surface form changes. This inconsistency is category-dependent: models are more robust to minor orthographic variations than to larger lexical variations such as aliases and abbreviations. Frequency analyses further suggest that both entity- and surface-level frequencies are associated with accuracy, and that entity frequency often contributes beyond surface frequency. Overall, factual memorization appears neither purely surface-specific nor fully surface-invariant, highlighting the importance of surface-form diversity in evaluating non-verbatim memorization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

Builds on

17 of 37 references.

References · 17

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  3. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  5. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,936
  6. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  7. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
  8. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,128
  9. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 719
  10. 2022Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail Knowledgecited by 458
  11. 2021Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 364
  12. 2021Simple Entity-Centric Questions Challenge Dense Retrieverscited by 140
5 more
  1. 2022Measuring Causal Effects of Data Statistics on Language Model's `Factual' Predictionscited by 57
  2. 2024Retrieval Helps or Hurts? A Deeper Dive into the Efficacy of Retrieval Augmentation to Language Modelscited by 19
  3. 2024Distinguishing Ignorance from Error in LLM Hallucinationscited by 14
  4. 2024Toward the Evaluation of Large Language Models Considering Score Variance across Instruction Templatescited by 7
  5. 2025Open-sci-ref-0.01: open and reproducible reference baselines for language model and dataset comparisoncited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.