mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Xinyu: An Efficient LLM-based System for Commentary Generation

arXiv 2408.11609 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Commentary provides readers with a deep understanding of events by presenting diverse arguments and evidence. However, creating commentary is a time-consuming task, even for skilled commentators. Large language models (LLMs) have simplified the process of natural language generation, but their direct application in commentary creation still faces challenges due to unique task requirements. These requirements can be categorized into two levels: 1) fundamental requirements, which include creating well-structured and logically consistent narratives, and 2) advanced requirements, which involve generating quality arguments and providing convincing evidence. In this paper, we introduce Xinyu, an efficient LLM-based system designed to assist commentators in generating Chinese commentaries. To meet the fundamental requirements, we deconstruct the generation process into sequential steps, proposing targeted strategies and supervised fine-tuning (SFT) for each step. To address the advanced requirements, we present an argument ranking model for arguments and establish a comprehensive evidence database that includes up-to-date events and classic books, thereby strengthening the substantiation of the evidence with retrieval augmented generation (RAG) technology. To evaluate the generated commentaries more fairly, corresponding to the two-level requirements, we introduce a comprehensive evaluation metric that considers five distinct perspectives in commentary generation. Our experiments confirm the effectiveness of our proposed system. We also observe a significant increase in the efficiency of commentators in real-world scenarios, with the average time spent on creating a commentary dropping from 4 hours to 20 minutes. Importantly, such an increase in efficiency does not compromise the quality of the commentaries.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2024.

Builds on

19 of 41 references.

References · 19

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
  4. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
  5. 2023REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Modelscited by 792
  6. 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 670
  7. 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 517
  8. 2023Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation Synergycited by 346
  9. 2023RECOMP: Improving Retrieval-Augmented LMs with Compression and Selective Augmentationcited by 256
  10. 2023Query2doc: Query Expansion with Large Language Modelscited by 149
  11. 2023Domain Specialization as the Key to Make Large Language Models Disruptive: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 135
  12. 2023DISC-LawLLM: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Intelligent Legal Servicescited by 120
7 more
  1. 2023AnglE-optimized Text Embeddingscited by 99
  2. 2023Large Language Models in Education: Vision and Opportunitiescited by 54
  3. 2023Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaborationcited by 52
  4. 2023On the Educational Impact of ChatGPT: Is Artificial Intelligence Ready to Obtain a University Degree?cited by 48
  5. 2024PLaD: Preference-based Large Language Model Distillation with Pseudo-Preference Pairscited by 11
  6. 2022Mask the Correct Tokens: An Embarrassingly Simple Approach for Error Correctioncited by 10
  7. 2023FedJudge: Federated Legal Large Language Modelcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Natural Language Generation Tasks
  2. 2024Enhancing Commentary Strategies for Imperfect Information Card Games: A Study of Large Language Models in Guandan Commentary
  3. 2024CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
  4. 2024DomainRAG: A Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Domain-specific Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  5. 2024RAGLAB: A Modular and Research-Oriented Unified Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  6. 2025ELLIS Alicante at CQs-Gen 2025: Winning the critical thinking questions shared task: LLM-based question generation and selection
  7. 2025SagaScale: A Realistic, Scalable, and High-Quality Long-Context Benchmark Built from Full-Length Novels
  8. 2023LLMRefine: Pinpointing and Refining Large Language Models via Fine-Grained Actionable Feedback