mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

daDPO: Distribution-Aware DPO for Distilling Conversational Abilities

arXiv 2506.15717 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across various applications, but their conversational abilities decline sharply as model size decreases, presenting a barrier to their deployment in resource-constrained environments. Knowledge distillation with Direct Preference Optimization (dDPO) has emerged as a promising approach to enhancing the conversational abilities of smaller models using a larger teacher model. However, current methods primarily focus on 'black-box' KD, which only uses the teacher's responses, overlooking the output distribution offered by the teacher. This paper addresses this gap by introducing daDPO (Distribution-Aware DPO), a unified method for preference optimization and distribution-based distillation. We provide rigorous theoretical analysis and empirical validation, showing that daDPO outperforms existing methods in restoring performance for pruned models and enhancing smaller LLM models. Notably, in in-domain evaluation, our method enables a 20% pruned Vicuna1.5-7B to achieve near-teacher performance (-7.3% preference rate compared to that of dDPO's -31%), and allows Qwen2.5-1.5B to occasionally outperform its 7B teacher model (14.0% win rate).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.

Builds on

26 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Understanding Reference Policies in Direct Preference Optimization18 Jul
  2. 2024Improving Conversational Abilities of Quantized Large Language Models via Direct Preference Alignment3 Jul
  3. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  4. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function18 Apr
  5. 2024Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correct4 Feb
  6. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment25 Oct
  7. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  8. 2023Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints28 Sep
  9. 2023Mitigating the Alignment Tax of RLHF12 Sep

Other references · 17

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  7. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  9. 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelcited by 1,135
  10. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  11. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 939
  12. 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 401
5 more
  1. 2025Mitigating Visual Forgetting via Take-along Visual Conditioning for Multi-modal Long CoT Reasoningcited by 32
  2. 2022What Makes Pre-trained Language Models Better Zero-shot Learners?cited by 23
  3. 2024CMR Scaling Law: Predicting Critical Mixture Ratios for Continual Pre-training of Language Modelscited by 23
  4. 2024Small But Funny: A Feedback-Driven Approach to Humor Distillationcited by 12
  5. 2024Reward Difference Optimization For Sample Reweighting In Offline RLHFcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 20243D-Properties: Identifying Challenges in DPO and Charting a Path Forward
  2. 2025Debate, Reflect, and Distill: Multi-Agent Feedback with Tree-Structured Preference Optimization for Efficient Language Model Enhancement
  3. 2024Relative Preference Optimization: Enhancing LLM Alignment through Contrasting Responses across Identical and Diverse Prompts
  4. 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization
  5. 2024Insights into Alignment: Evaluating DPO and its Variants Across Multiple Tasks
  6. 2026Towards Bridging the Gap Between Offline and Iterative Alignment via Preference Distillation
  7. 2024Optimizing LLMs with Direct Preferences: A Data Efficiency Perspective
  8. 2024Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMs