mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Differential Privacy

arXiv 2110.15252 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) takes a first step towards privacy-preserving machine learning by training models while keeping client data local. Models trained using FL may still leak private client information through model updates during training. Differential privacy (DP) may be employed on model updates to provide privacy guarantees within FL, typically at the cost of degraded performance of the final trained model. Both non-private FL and DP-FL can be solved using variants of the federated averaging (FedAvg) algorithm. In this work, we consider a heterogeneous DP setup where clients require varying degrees of privacy guarantees. First, we analyze the optimal solution to the federated linear regression problem with heterogeneous DP in a Bayesian setup. We find that unlike the non-private setup, where the optimal solution for homogeneous data amounts to a single global solution for all clients learned through FedAvg, the optimal solution for each client in this setup would be a personalized one even for homogeneous data. We also analyze the privacy-utility trade-off for this setup, where we characterize the gain obtained from heterogeneous privacy where some clients opt for less strict privacy guarantees. We propose a new algorithm for FL with heterogeneous DP, named FedHDP, which employs personalization and weighted averaging at the server using the privacy choices of clients, to achieve better performance on clients' local models. Through numerical experiments, we show that FedHDP provides up to 9.27% performance gain compared to the baseline DP-FL for the considered datasets where 5% of clients opt out of DP. Additionally, we show a gap in the average performance of local models between non-private and private clients of up to 3.49%, empirically illustrating that the baseline DP-FL might incur a large utility cost when not all clients require the stricter privacy guarantees.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2021.

Builds on

40 of 57 references.

References · 40

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  4. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  5. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  6. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  7. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
  8. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,046
  9. 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 851
  10. 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 672
  11. 2020Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalizationcited by 672
  12. 2020Personalized Federated Learning with Moreau Envelopescited by 618
28 more
  1. 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 564
  2. 2020Federated Learning with Matched Averagingcited by 564
  3. 2019Federated Learning with Personalization Layerscited by 541
  4. 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
  5. 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 459
  6. 2020Adaptive Personalized Federated Learningcited by 358
  7. 2020Three Approaches for Personalization with Applications to Federated Learningcited by 325
  8. 2021A Field Guide to Federated Optimizationcited by 315
  9. 2020Personalized Federated Learning: A Meta-Learning Approachcited by 312
  10. 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 220
  11. 2021FjORD: Fair and Accurate Federated Learning under heterogeneous targets with Ordered Dropoutcited by 192
  12. 2019Adaptive Gradient-Based Meta-Learning Methodscited by 183
  13. 2018Expanding the Reach of Federated Learning by Reducing Client Resource Requirementscited by 163
  14. 2019Federated Evaluation of On-device Personalizationcited by 147
  15. 2020LDP-Fed: Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacycited by 132
  16. 2021Hyperparameter Tuning with Renyi Differential Privacycited by 104
  17. 2020Bypassing the Ambient Dimension: Private SGD with Gradient Subspace Identificationcited by 90
  18. 2020Federated Learning via Posterior Averaging: A New Perspective and Practical Algorithmscited by 78
  19. 2021Fast Federated Learning in the Presence of Arbitrary Device Unavailabilitycited by 72
  20. 2019Variational Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 69
  21. 2020LDP-FL: Practical Private Aggregation in Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacycited by 64
  22. 2018Multi-objective Evolutionary Federated Learningcited by 42
  23. 2021Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacy: Trade-offs between Privacy, Utility, and Communicationcited by 39
  24. 2015Heterogeneous Differential Privacycited by 30
  25. 2021Private Federated Learning Without a Trusted Server: Optimal Algorithms for Convex Lossescited by 30
  26. 2017BLENDER: Enabling Local Search with a Hybrid Differential Privacy Modelcited by 14
  27. 2019The power of synergy in differential privacy: Combining a small curator with local randomizerscited by 6
  28. 2014Learning from Data with Heterogeneous Noise using SGDcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

5 papers.