Are Female Carpenters like Blue Bananas? A Corpus Investigation of Occupation Gender Typicality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
People tend to use language to mention surprising properties of events: for example, when a banana is blue, we are more likely to mention color than when it is yellow. This fact is taken to suggest that yellowness is somehow a typical feature of bananas, and blueness is exceptional. Similar to how a yellow color is typical of bananas, there may also be genders that are typical of occupations. In this work, we explore this question using information theoretic techniques coupled with corpus statistic analysis. In two distinct large corpora, we do not find strong evidence that occupations and gender display the same patterns of mentioning as do bananas and color. Instead, we find that gender mentioning is correlated with femaleness of occupation in particular, suggesting perhaps that woman-dominated occupations are seen as somehow ``more gendered'' than male-dominated ones, and thereby they encourage more gender mentioning overall.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2024.
Builds on
22 of 46 references.
References · 22
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
- 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 723
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
- 2020Recipes for building an open-domain chatbotcited by 593
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 442
- 2020The Pushshift Reddit Datasetcited by 292
- 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 249
- 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
- 2020Unmasking Contextual Stereotypes: Measuring and Mitigating BERT's Gender Biascited by 82
- 2015It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopediacited by 30
10 more
- 2019When redundancy is useful: A Bayesian approach to 'overinformative' referring expressionscited by 21
- 2019Unsupervised Discovery of Gendered Language through Latent-Variable Modelingcited by 19
- 2019Good Secretaries, Bad Truck Drivers? Occupational Gender Stereotypes in Sentiment Analysiscited by 19
- 2020Type B Reflexivization as an Unambiguous Testbed for Multilingual Multi-Task Gender Biascited by 15
- 2021Extending Challenge Sets to Uncover Gender Bias in Machine Translation: Impact of Stereotypical Verbs and Adjectivescited by 14
- 2020On the Relationships Between the Grammatical Genders of Inanimate Nouns and Their Co-Occurring Adjectives and Verbscited by 8
- 2019Quantifying the Semantic Core of Gender Systemscited by 6
- 2020Predicting Declension Class from Form and Meaningcited by 5
- 2023The Causal Influence of Grammatical Gender on Distributional Semanticscited by 3
- 2019On the Idiosyncrasies of the Mandarin Chinese Classifier Systemcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
- 2025Domain Regeneration: How well do LLMs match syntactic properties of text domains?cited by 6
- 2025On the Mutual Influence of Gender and Occupation in LLM Representationscited by 4
- 2025Investigating Intersectional Bias in Large Language Models using Confidence Disparities in Coreference Resolutioncited by 3
- 2025Investigating Intersectional Bias in Large Language Models using Confidence Disparities in Coreference Resolution9 Aug 2025
- 2025Domain Regeneration: How well do LLMs match syntactic properties of text domains?12 May 2025
- 2025On the Mutual Influence of Gender and Occupation in LLM Representations9 Mar 2025