Source-Free Domain-Invariant Performance Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurately estimating model performance poses a significant challenge, particularly in scenarios where the source and target domains follow different data distributions. Most existing performance prediction methods heavily rely on the source data in their estimation process, limiting their applicability in a more realistic setting where only the trained model is accessible. The few methods that do not require source data exhibit considerably inferior performance. In this work, we propose a source-free approach centred on uncertainty-based estimation, using a generative model for calibration in the absence of source data. We establish connections between our approach for unsupervised calibration and temperature scaling. We then employ a gradient-based strategy to evaluate the correctness of the calibrated predictions. Our experiments on benchmark object recognition datasets reveal that existing source-based methods fall short with limited source sample availability. Furthermore, our approach significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art source-free and source-based methods, affirming its effectiveness in domain-invariant performance estimation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2024.
Builds on
32 of 40 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,181
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
- 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
- 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
20 more
- 2019Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like Onecited by 402
- 2017Functional Map of the Worldcited by 338
- 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 338
- 2018Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networkscited by 314
- 2021Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A Simple Baselinecited by 200
- 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performancecited by 141
- 2018Deep Convolutional Networks as shallow Gaussian Processescited by 137
- 2021Assessing Generalization of SGD via Disagreementcited by 116
- 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
- 2020Are Labels Always Necessary for Classifier Accuracy Evaluation?cited by 104
- 2022Agreement-on-the-Line: Predicting the Performance of Neural Networks under Distribution Shiftcited by 94
- 2021What Does Rotation Prediction Tell Us about Classifier Accuracy under Varying Testing Environments?cited by 63
- 2022Predicting Out-of-Distribution Error with the Projection Normcited by 50
- 2023Confidence and Dispersity Speak: Characterising Prediction Matrix for Unsupervised Accuracy Estimationcited by 22
- 2023(Almost) Provable Error Bounds Under Distribution Shift via Disagreement Discrepancycited by 16
- 2024Energy-based Automated Model Evaluationcited by 16
- 2023On the Importance of Feature Separability in Predicting Out-Of-Distribution Errorcited by 15
- 2023Predicting Out-of-Distribution Error with Confidence Optimal Transportcited by 13
- 2023Density-Softmax: Efficient Test-time Model for Uncertainty Estimation and Robustness under Distribution Shiftscited by 12
- 2024Leveraging Gradients for Unsupervised Accuracy Estimation under Distribution Shiftcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.