Dissecting Dissonance: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models Against Self-Contradictory Instructions
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large multimodal models (LMMs) excel in adhering to human instructions. However, self-contradictory instructions may arise due to the increasing trend of multimodal interaction and context length, which is challenging for language beginners and vulnerable populations. We introduce the Self-Contradictory Instructions benchmark to evaluate the capability of LMMs in recognizing conflicting commands. It comprises 20,000 conflicts, evenly distributed between language and vision paradigms. It is constructed by a novel automatic dataset creation framework, which expedites the process and enables us to encompass a wide range of instruction forms. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals current LMMs consistently struggle to identify multimodal instruction discordance due to a lack of self-awareness. Hence, we propose the Cognitive Awakening Prompting to inject cognition from external, largely enhancing dissonance detection. The dataset and code are here: https://selfcontradiction.github.io/.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 38 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2024.
Builds on
38 of 52 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2024How Easy is It to Fool Your Multimodal LLMs? An Empirical Analysis on Deceptive Prompts20 Feb
- 2024From Training-Free to Adaptive: Empirical Insights into MLLMs' Understanding of Detection Information31 Jan
- 2023SPHINX: The Joint Mixing of Weights, Tasks, and Visual Embeddings for Multi-modal Large Language Models13 Nov
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning5 Oct
- 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHF25 Sep
- 2023MMICL: Empowering Vision-language Model with Multi-Modal In-Context Learning14 Sep
Other references · 32
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
20 more
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 805
- 2023LLaMA-Adapter V2: Parameter-Efficient Visual Instruction Modelcited by 602
- 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
- 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 486
- 2023TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answeringcited by 416
- 2022Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 334
- 2023HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 329
- 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 230
- 2022Factuality Enhanced Language Models for Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 200
- 2022Rich Knowledge Sources Bring Complex Knowledge Conflicts: Recalibrating Models to Reflect Conflicting Evidencecited by 142
- 2023Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGIcited by 94
- 2023Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Large Language Modelscited by 49
- 2023Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progresscited by 48
- 2023Propagating Knowledge Updates to LMs Through Distillationcited by 28
- 2022Knowledge-in-Context: Towards Knowledgeable Semi-Parametric Language Modelscited by 24
- 2023AutoHall: Automated Factuality Hallucination Dataset Generation for Large Language Modelscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024NoisyEQA: Benchmarking Embodied Question Answering Against Noisy Queriescited by 10
- 2025REI-Bench: Can Embodied Agents Understand Vague Human Instructions in Task Planning?cited by 7
- 2025Can Large Multimodal Models Actively Recognize Faulty Inputs? A Systematic Evaluation Framework of Their Input Scrutiny Abilitycited by 3
- 2025Separator Injection Attack: Uncovering Dialogue Biases in Large Language Models Caused by Role Separatorscited by 1
- 2026Causal Evidence for Attention Head Imbalance in Modality Conflict Hallucinationcited by 1
- 2026TALK-Dem: Benchmarking Embodied Task Planning under Dementia-Associated Communication Patternscited by 0
- 2026TALK-Dem: Benchmarking Embodied Task Planning under Dementia-Associated Communication Patterns29 Sep 2026
- 2026Causal Evidence for Attention Head Imbalance in Modality Conflict Hallucination19 May 2026
- 2025Can Large Multimodal Models Actively Recognize Faulty Inputs? A Systematic Evaluation Framework of Their Input Scrutiny Ability6 Aug 2025
- 2025REI-Bench: Can Embodied Agents Understand Vague Human Instructions in Task Planning?16 May 2025
- 2025Separator Injection Attack: Uncovering Dialogue Biases in Large Language Models Caused by Role Separators8 Apr 2025
- 2024NoisyEQA: Benchmarking Embodied Question Answering Against Noisy Queries14 Dec 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Beyond Task Performance: Evaluating and Reducing the Flaws of Large Multimodal Models with In-Context Learning
- 2024MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs
- 2026Omni-Modal Dissonance Benchmark: Systematically Breaking Modality Consensus to Probe Robustness and Calibrated Abstention
- 2024MM-SAP: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Self-Awareness of Multimodal Large Language Models in Perception
- 2025When One Modality Sabotages the Others: A Diagnostic Lens on Multimodal Reasoning
- 2026Same Semantics, Different Outcome: On the Modality Robustness of Multimodal LLMs under Knowledge Conflict
- 2026The Unwritten Benchmark: A New Challenge for Multimodal Machine Learning in Abstract Perceptual Reasoning
- 2025Benchmarking Multimodal Knowledge Conflict for Large Multimodal Models