TALK-Dem: Benchmarking Embodied Task Planning under Dementia-Associated Communication Patterns
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing LLM-driven robot task planners rely on a taken-for-granted assumption of an ideal user whose instructions are clear, complete, and task-focused. However, when interacting with real-world users, especially those experiencing cognitive impairments, such as people living with dementia (PLWD), the planners often make mistakes and even pose physical safety risks. We proposed TALK-Dem (Talking Attributes and Linguistic Knowledge in Dementia), the first benchmark for evaluating LLM-driven robot task planning under dementia-associated verbal communication. TALK-Dem contains 4,800 instructions and covers five typical communication patterns, including Referential Imprecision, Object Substitution, Empty Speech, Topic Drift, and Intrusion, at three intensity levels. Experiments across six open-weight LLMs reveal a substantial robustness gap. Across communication patterns, open-weight models exhibited performance drops of up to 22.3 percentage points compared to ideal instructions. This revealed a critical gap and even danger for real-world applications, especially in assistive robotics, where locally deployable models are necessary due to privacy concerns and connectivity constraints. To mitigate this issue, we proposed the Context-Aware Retrieval from Experience (CARE) method, which retrieves relevant previously resolved tasks to provide task-specific interpretation and planning context. CARE generally outperformed standard prompting baselines across the six open-weight models, improving average task success by 18.1 percentage points over the vanilla prompt. These results highlighted the importance of both evaluating communication robustness and developing effective adaptation strategies for locally deployable assistive robots. The TALK-Dem dataset is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TALK-Dem-A6B3/.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
20 of 47 references.
References · 20
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,081
- 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 869
- 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 783
- 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 501
- 2022LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 462
- 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Plannerscited by 308
- 2024Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Makingcited by 144
8 more
- 2022DialFRED: Dialogue-Enabled Agents for Embodied Instruction Followingcited by 63
- 2024LoTa-Bench: Benchmarking Language-oriented Task Planners for Embodied Agentscited by 51
- 2023CLARA: Classifying and Disambiguating User Commands for Reliable Interactive Robotic Agentscited by 30
- 2025AmbiK: Dataset of Ambiguous Tasks in Kitchen Environmentcited by 9
- 2025How Real Are Synthetic Therapy Conversations? Evaluating Fidelity in Prolonged Exposure Dialoguescited by 8
- 2025TTSDS2: Resources and Benchmark for Evaluating Human-Quality Text to Speech Systemscited by 8
- 2025REI-Bench: Can Embodied Agents Understand Vague Human Instructions in Task Planning?cited by 7
- 2024Dissecting Dissonance: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models Against Self-Contradictory Instructionscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.