The Cross-environment Hyperparameter Setting Benchmark for Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces a new empirical methodology, the Cross-environment Hyperparameter Setting Benchmark, that compares RL algorithms across environments using a single hyperparameter setting, encouraging algorithmic development which is insensitive to hyperparameters. We demonstrate that this benchmark is robust to statistical noise and obtains qualitatively similar results across repeated applications, even when using few samples. This robustness makes the benchmark computationally cheap to apply, allowing statistically sound insights at low cost. We demonstrate two example instantiations of the CHS, on a set of six small control environments (SC-CHS) and on the entire DM Control suite of 28 environments (DMC-CHS). Finally, to illustrate the applicability of the CHS to modern RL algorithms on challenging environments, we conduct a novel empirical study of an open question in the continuous control literature. We show, with high confidence, that there is no meaningful difference in performance between Ornstein-Uhlenbeck noise and uncorrelated Gaussian noise for exploration with the DDPG algorithm on the DMC-CHS.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2024.
Builds on
25 of 42 references.
References · 25
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
- 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
- 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
- 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 727
- 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 632
- 2016Reinforcement Learning with Unsupervised Auxiliary Taskscited by 400
13 more
- 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
- 2018Distributed Distributional Deterministic Policy Gradientscited by 195
- 2020Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOcited by 184
- 2020Acme: A Research Framework for Distributed Reinforcement Learningcited by 146
- 2019When to use parametric models in reinforcement learning?cited by 118
- 2020Revisiting Rainbow: Promoting more Insightful and Inclusive Deep Reinforcement Learning Researchcited by 78
- 2018How Many Random Seeds? Statistical Power Analysis in Deep Reinforcement Learning Experimentscited by 56
- 2023Empirical Design in Reinforcement Learningcited by 54
- 2020Evaluating the Performance of Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 35
- 2021A Generalized Projected Bellman Error for Off-policy Value Estimation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2017Pitfalls and Best Practices in Algorithm Configurationcited by 25
- 2019Benchmarking Bonus-Based Exploration Methods on the Arcade Learning Environmentcited by 17
- 2016Investigating practical linear temporal difference learningcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.