mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HICEScore: A Hierarchical Metric for Image Captioning Evaluation

arXiv 2407.18589 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2024cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image captioning evaluation metrics can be divided into two categories, reference-based metrics and reference-free metrics. However, reference-based approaches may struggle to evaluate descriptive captions with abundant visual details produced by advanced multimodal large language models, due to their heavy reliance on limited human-annotated references. In contrast, previous reference-free metrics have been proven effective via CLIP cross-modality similarity. Nonetheless, CLIP-based metrics, constrained by their solution of global image-text compatibility, often have a deficiency in detecting local textual hallucinations and are insensitive to small visual objects. Besides, their single-scale designs are unable to provide an interpretable evaluation process such as pinpointing the position of caption mistakes and identifying visual regions that have not been described. To move forward, we propose a novel reference-free metric for image captioning evaluation, dubbed Hierarchical Image Captioning Evaluation Score (HICE-S). By detecting local visual regions and textual phrases, HICE-S builds an interpretable hierarchical scoring mechanism, breaking through the barriers of the single-scale structure of existing reference-free metrics. Comprehensive experiments indicate that our proposed metric achieves the SOTA performance on several benchmarks, outperforming existing reference-free metrics like CLIP-S and PAC-S, and reference-based metrics like METEOR and CIDEr. Moreover, several case studies reveal that the assessment process of HICE-S on detailed captions closely resembles interpretable human judgments.Our code is available at https://github.com/joeyz0z/HICE.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2024.

Builds on

39 of 71 references.

References · 39

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  4. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  5. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  6. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
  7. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  8. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  9. 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
  10. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  11. 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 661
  12. 2021RegionCLIP: Region-based Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 612
27 more
  1. 2015Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answeringcited by 273
  2. 2016Image Captioning with Semantic Attentioncited by 260
  3. 2023Segment Anything in Medical Imagescited by 226
  4. 2015Sequence to Sequence -- Video to Textcited by 157
  5. 2023Alpha-CLIP: A CLIP Model Focusing on Wherever You Wantcited by 150
  6. 2017FOIL it! Find One mismatch between Image and Language captioncited by 95
  7. 2023Anything-3D: Towards Single-view Anything Reconstruction in the Wildcited by 91
  8. 2023ChatGPT Asks, BLIP-2 Answers: Automatic Questioning Towards Enriched Visual Descriptionscited by 86
  9. 2023Positive-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Image and Video Captioning Evaluationcited by 78
  10. 2019TIGEr: Text-to-Image Grounding for Image Caption Evaluationcited by 58
  11. 2018Learning to Evaluate Image Captioningcited by 53
  12. 2023Generalist Vision Foundation Models for Medical Imaging: A Case Study of Segment Anything Model on Zero-Shot Medical Segmentationcited by 51
  13. 2023FACTUAL: A Benchmark for Faithful and Consistent Textual Scene Graph Parsingcited by 50
  14. 2016Re-evaluating Automatic Metrics for Image Captioningcited by 45
  15. 2023MobileSAMv2: Faster Segment Anything to Everythingcited by 41
  16. 2021UMIC: An Unreferenced Metric for Image Captioning via Contrastive Learningcited by 37
  17. 2022End-to-End Transformer Based Model for Image Captioningcited by 37
  18. 2021EMScore: Evaluating Video Captioning via Coarse-Grained and Fine-Grained Embedding Matchingcited by 36
  19. 2015From Images to Sentences through Scene Description Graphs using Commonsense Reasoning and Knowledgecited by 35
  20. 2022Mutual Information Divergence: A Unified Metric for Multimodal Generative Modelscited by 35
  21. 2024MeaCap: Memory-Augmented Zero-shot Image Captioningcited by 35
  22. 2023ConZIC: Controllable Zero-shot Image Captioning by Sampling-Based Polishingcited by 33
  23. 2023InfoMetIC: An Informative Metric for Reference-free Image Caption Evaluationcited by 25
  24. 2016Image Captioning with Deep Bidirectional LSTMscited by 21
  25. 2022Visual Clues: Bridging Vision and Language Foundations for Image Paragraph Captioningcited by 21
  26. 2016Text-guided Attention Model for Image Captioningcited by 13
  27. 2024SnapCap: Efficient Snapshot Compressive Video Captioningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024FLEUR: An Explainable Reference-Free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning Using a Large Multimodal Model
  2. 2024Vision Language Model-based Caption Evaluation Method Leveraging Visual Context Extraction
  3. 2024Benchmarking and Improving Detail Image Caption
  4. 2025CapArena: Benchmarking and Analyzing Detailed Image Captioning in the LLM Era
  5. 2026ITIScore: An Image-to-Text-to-Image Rating Framework for the Image Captioning Ability of MLLMs
  6. 2025CAPability: A Comprehensive Visual Caption Benchmark for Evaluating Both Correctness and Thoroughness
  7. 2025LOTUS: A Leaderboard for Detailed Image Captioning from Quality to Societal Bias and User Preferences
  8. 2026DEPICT: Scoring Text-to-Image Alignment by Answer Agreement