mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Positive-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Vision-and-Language Evaluation and Training

arXiv 2410.07336 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite significant advancements in caption generation, existing evaluation metrics often fail to capture the full quality or fine-grained details of captions. This is mainly due to their reliance on non-specific human-written references or noisy pre-training data. Still, finding an effective metric is crucial not only for captions evaluation but also for the generation phase. Metrics can indeed play a key role in the fine-tuning stage of captioning models, ultimately enhancing the quality of the generated captions. In this paper, we propose PAC-S++, a learnable metric that leverages the CLIP model, pre-trained on both web-collected and cleaned data and regularized through additional pairs of generated visual and textual positive samples. Exploiting this stronger and curated pre-training, we also apply PAC-S++ as a reward in the Self-Critical Sequence Training (SCST) stage typically employed to fine-tune captioning models. Extensive experiments on different image and video datasets highlight the effectiveness of PAC-S++ compared to popular metrics for the task, including its sensitivity to object hallucinations. Furthermore, we show that integrating PAC-S++ into the fine-tuning stage of a captioning model results in semantically richer captions with fewer repetitions and grammatical errors. Evaluations on out-of-domain benchmarks further demonstrate the efficacy of our fine-tuning approach in enhancing model capabilities. Source code and trained models are publicly available at: https://github.com/aimagelab/pacscore.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 67 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2024.

Builds on

67 of 85 references.

References · 67

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  6. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  7. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  8. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  9. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  10. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  11. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
  12. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
38 more
  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  2. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  3. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  4. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  5. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  6. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,876
  7. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  8. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
  9. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,423
  10. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
  11. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
  12. 2023ShareGPT4V: Improving Large Multi-Modal Models with Better Captionscited by 1,005
  13. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 968
  14. 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 879
  15. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 824
  16. 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 559
  17. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 547
  18. 2018nocaps: novel object captioning at scalecited by 444
  19. 2019VATEX: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Multilingual Dataset for Video-and-Language Researchcited by 414
  20. 2019Meshed-Memory Transformer for Image Captioningcited by 343
  21. 2023OBELICS: An Open Web-Scale Filtered Dataset of Interleaved Image-Text Documentscited by 316
  22. 2019Attention on Attention for Image Captioningcited by 289
  23. 2018Auto-Encoding Scene Graphs for Image Captioningcited by 255
  24. 2020X-Linear Attention Networks for Image Captioningcited by 198
  25. 2021Simple but Effective: CLIP Embeddings for Embodied AIcited by 191
  26. 2024Building and better understanding vision-language models: insights and future directionscited by 173
  27. 2023Alpha-CLIP: A CLIP Model Focusing on Wherever You Wantcited by 151
  28. 2021From Show to Tell: A Survey on Deep Learning-based Image Captioningcited by 138
  29. 2020Captioning Images Taken by People Who Are Blindcited by 110
  30. 2017FOIL it! Find One mismatch between Image and Language captioncited by 95
  31. 2022SmallCap: Lightweight Image Captioning Prompted with Retrieval Augmentationcited by 82
  32. 2024Benchmarking and Improving Detail Image Captioncited by 81
  33. 2018Grounded Video Descriptioncited by 78
  34. 2023Positive-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Image and Video Captioning Evaluationcited by 78
  35. 2021Dual-Level Collaborative Transformer for Image Captioningcited by 71
  36. 2022Fine-grained Image Captioning with CLIP Rewardcited by 69
  37. 2019TIGEr: Text-to-Image Grounding for Image Caption Evaluationcited by 58
  38. 2022Disentangling visual and written concepts in CLIPcited by 58

50 most cited of 67 All 67 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 10; 2026: 6.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Image Captioning Evaluation in the Age of Multimodal LLMs: Challenges and Future Perspectivescited by 18
  2. 2025Evaluation of Multilingual Image Captioning: How far can we get with CLIP models?cited by 5
  3. 2025VELA: An LLM-Hybrid-as-a-Judge Approach for Evaluating Long Image Captionscited by 5
  4. 2025VC-Inspector: Advancing Reference-free Evaluation of Video Captions with Factual Analysiscited by 4
  5. 2025DISCODE: Distribution-Aware Score Decoder for Robust Automatic Evaluation of Image Captioningcited by 2
  6. 2025LLM-Free Image Captioning Evaluation in Reference-Flexible Settingscited by 2
  7. 2026Do Image-Text Metrics Respect Semantic Invariances?cited by 2
  8. 2025Is Perturbation-Based Image Protection Disruptive to Image Editing?cited by 1
  9. 2025Are Large Vision-Language Models Ready to Guide Blind and Low-Vision Individuals?cited by 1
  10. 2026MLLM-as-a-Judge Exhibits Model Preference Biascited by 1
  11. 2026RaTA-Tool: Retrieval-based Tool Selection with Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1
  12. 2026Rigel: Self-Distilled Score Adaptation for Image and Video Captioning Evaluationcited by 1
4 more
  1. 2025How Blind and Low-Vision Individuals Prefer Large Vision-Language Model-Generated Scene Descriptionscited by 0
  2. 2025Redemption Score: A Multi-Modal Evaluation Framework for Image Captioning via Distributional, Perceptual, and Linguistic Signal Triangulationcited by 0
  3. 2026Hyperdimensional Cross-Modal Alignment of Frozen Language and Image Models for Efficient Image Captioningcited by 0
  4. 2026BEiTScore: Reference-free Image Captioning Evaluation with an Efficient Cross-Encoder Modelcited by 0