Is user feedback always informative? Retrieval Latent Defending for Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation without Source Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper aims to adapt the source model to the target environment, leveraging small user feedback (i.e., labeled target data) readily available in real-world applications. We find that existing semi-supervised domain adaptation (SemiSDA) methods often suffer from poorly improved adaptation performance when directly utilizing such feedback data, as shown in Figure 1. We analyze this phenomenon via a novel concept called Negatively Biased Feedback (NBF), which stems from the observation that user feedback is more likely for data points where the model produces incorrect predictions. To leverage this feedback while avoiding the issue, we propose a scalable adapting approach, Retrieval Latent Defending. This approach helps existing SemiSDA methods to adapt the model with a balanced supervised signal by utilizing latent defending samples throughout the adaptation process. We demonstrate the problem caused by NBF and the efficacy of our approach across various benchmarks, including image classification, semantic segmentation, and a real-world medical imaging application. Our extensive experiments reveal that integrating our approach with multiple state-of-the-art SemiSDA methods leads to significant performance improvements.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 83 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2024.
Builds on
83 of 98 references.
References · 83
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,917
38 more
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
- 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,200
- 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
- 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
- 2016Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Gamescited by 818
- 2017Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 683
- 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 635
- 2018ADVENT: Adversarial Entropy Minimization for Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 623
- 2016Deep Transfer Learning with Joint Adaptation Networkscited by 612
- 2019MIMIC-CXR-JPG, a large publicly available database of labeled chest radiographscited by 597
- 2018Learning to Adapt Structured Output Space for Semantic Segmentationcited by 584
- 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 540
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
- 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 510
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
- 2019ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoringcited by 349
- 2019Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation via Minimax Entropycited by 335
- 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
- 2022FreeMatch: Self-adaptive Thresholding for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 232
- 2020Instance Adaptive Self-Training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 177
- 2021Exploiting the Intrinsic Neighborhood Structure for Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 177
- 2021CReST: A Class-Rebalancing Self-Training Framework for Imbalanced Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 175
- 2021Generalized Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 175
- 2021Source-Free Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 168
- 2021Reviving Iterative Training with Mask Guidance for Interactive Segmentationcited by 163
- 2017Interactive Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedbackcited by 158
- 2021Dash: Semi-Supervised Learning with Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 148
- 2019Transferrable Prototypical Networks for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 141
- 2023SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 133
- 2021TorchXRayVision: A library of chest X-ray datasets and modelscited by 131
- 2017Deep TAMER: Interactive Agent Shaping in High-Dimensional State Spacescited by 123
- 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
- 2020f-BRS: Rethinking Backpropagating Refinement for Interactive Segmentationcited by 117
- 2017Deep Active Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 108
50 most cited of 83 All 83 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.