mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Holding AI to Account: Challenges for the Delivery of Trustworthy AI in Healthcare

arXiv 2211.16444 ↗First posted 29 Nov 2022cs.AI cs.HCcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The need for AI systems to provide explanations for their behaviour is now widely recognised as key to their adoption. In this paper, we examine the problem of trustworthy AI and explore what delivering this means in practice, with a focus on healthcare applications. Work in this area typically treats trustworthy AI as a problem of Human-Computer Interaction involving the individual user and an AI system. However, we argue here that this overlooks the important part played by organisational accountability in how people reason about and trust AI in socio-technical settings. To illustrate the importance of organisational accountability, we present findings from ethnographic studies of breast cancer screening and cancer treatment planning in multidisciplinary team meetings to show how participants made themselves accountable both to each other and to the organisations of which they are members. We use these findings to enrich existing understandings of the requirements for trustworthy AI and to outline some candidate solutions to the problems of making AI accountable both to individual users and organisationally. We conclude by outlining the implications of this for future work on the development of trustworthy AI, including ways in which our proposed solutions may be re-used in different application settings.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 143 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2022.

Builds on

19 of 143 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  2. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
  3. 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 254
  4. 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
  5. 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 238
  6. 2018Explaining Explanations in AIcited by 137
  7. 2021Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemscited by 124
  8. 2020Explainable deep learning models in medical image analysiscited by 111
  9. 2019Human-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms during Medical Decision-Makingcited by 109
  10. 2020The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: a comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategiescited by 92
  11. 2021Unbox the Black-box for the Medical Explainable AI via Multi-modal and Multi-centre Data Fusion: A Mini-Review, Two Showcases and Beyondcited by 76
  12. 2019Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safetycited by 68
7 more
  1. 2020Trustworthy AIcited by 62
  2. 2019Unremarkable AI: Fitting Intelligent Decision Support into Critical, Clinical Decision-Making Processescited by 53
  3. 2020Detection of data drift and outliers affecting machine learning model performance over timecited by 19
  4. 2018Multiple Instance Learning for Heterogeneous Images: Training a CNN for Histopathologycited by 17
  5. 2020Survey of XAI in digital pathologycited by 14
  6. 2018Open the Black Box Data-Driven Explanation of Black Box Decision Systemscited by 9
  7. 2022Trust, Professional Vision and Diagnostic Workcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

9 papers.