mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The GPT Surprise: Offering Large Language Model Chat in a Massive Coding Class Reduced Engagement but Increased Adopters Exam Performances

arXiv 2407.09975 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.CLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are quickly being adopted in a wide range of learning experiences, especially via ubiquitous and broadly accessible chat interfaces like ChatGPT and Copilot. This type of interface is readily available to students and teachers around the world, yet relatively little research has been done to assess the impact of such generic tools on student learning. Coding education is an interesting test case, both because LLMs have strong performance on coding tasks, and because LLM-powered support tools are rapidly becoming part of the workflow of professional software engineers. To help understand the impact of generic LLM use on coding education, we conducted a large-scale randomized control trial with 5,831 students from 146 countries in an online coding class in which we provided some students with access to a chat interface with GPT-4. We estimate positive benefits on exam performance for adopters, the students who used the tool, but over all students, the advertisement of GPT-4 led to a significant average decrease in exam participation. We observe similar decreases in other forms of course engagement. However, this decrease is modulated by the student's country of origin. Offering access to LLMs to students from low human development index countries increased their exam participation rate on average. Our results suggest there may be promising benefits to using LLMs in an introductory coding class, but also potential harms for engagement, which makes their longer term impact on student success unclear. Our work highlights the need for additional investigations to help understand the potential impact of future adoption and integration of LLMs into classrooms.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2024.

Builds on

7 of 50 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effectscited by 254
  2. 2023Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hintscited by 42
  3. 2016The Econometrics of Randomized Experimentscited by 14
  4. 2023Reinforcement Learning Tutor Better Supported Lower Performers in a Math Taskcited by 11
  5. 2023Are LLMs Useful in the Poorest Schools? TheTeacher.AI in Sierra Leonecited by 4
  6. 2024AI Teaches the Art of Elegant Coding: Timely, Fair, and Helpful Style Feedback in a Global Coursecited by 2
  7. 2016A Generalized Approach to Power Analysis for Local Average Treatment Effectscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: