mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Visual Place Recognition Based Robot Navigation By Verifying Localization Estimates

arXiv 2407.08162 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2024cs.CV cs.ROcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual Place Recognition (VPR) systems often have imperfect performance, affecting the `integrity' of position estimates and subsequent robot navigation decisions. Previously, SVM classifiers have been used to monitor VPR integrity. This research introduces a novel Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) integrity monitor which demonstrates improved performance and generalizability, removing per-environment training and reducing manual tuning requirements. We test our proposed system in extensive real-world experiments, presenting two real-time integrity-based VPR verification methods: a single-query rejection method for robot navigation to a goal zone (Experiment 1); and a history-of-queries method that takes a best, verified, match from its recent trajectory and uses an odometer to extrapolate a current position estimate (Experiment 2). Noteworthy results for Experiment 1 include a decrease in aggregate mean along-track goal error from ~9.8m to ~3.1m, and an increase in the aggregate rate of successful mission completion from ~41% to ~55%. Experiment 2 showed a decrease in aggregate mean along-track localization error from ~2.0m to ~0.5m, and an increase in the aggregate localization precision from ~97% to ~99%. Overall, our results demonstrate the practical usefulness of a VPR integrity monitor in real-world robotics to improve VPR localization and consequent navigation performance.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2024.

Builds on

17 of 42 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognitioncited by 935
  2. 2019Learning with Average Precision: Training Image Retrieval with a Listwise Losscited by 184
  3. 2022Rethinking Visual Geo-localization for Large-Scale Applicationscited by 160
  4. 2023MixVPR: Feature Mixing for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 160
  5. 2023AnyLoc: Towards Universal Visual Place Recognitioncited by 159
  6. 2023Optimal Transport Aggregation for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 151
  7. 2022TransVPR: Transformer-based place recognition with multi-level attention aggregationcited by 102
  8. 2023Data-efficient Large Scale Place Recognition with Graded Similarity Supervisioncited by 43
  9. 2020Bayesian Triplet Loss: Uncertainty Quantification in Image Retrievalcited by 31
  10. 2022Learning Sequential Descriptors for Sequence-based Visual Place Recognitioncited by 25
  11. 2021Probabilistic Visual Place Recognition for Hierarchical Localizationcited by 20
  12. 2021What makes visual place recognition easy or hard?cited by 14
5 more
  1. 2019MRS-VPR: a multi-resolution sampling based global visual place recognition methodcited by 9
  2. 2021Unsupervised Complementary-aware Multi-process Fusion for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 6
  3. 2022Boosting Performance of a Baseline Visual Place Recognition Technique by Predicting the Maximally Complementary Techniquecited by 3
  4. 2021Robust GPS-Vision Localization via Integrity-Driven Landmark Attentioncited by 2
  5. 2019Visual Measurement Integrity Monitoring for UAV Localizationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.