Quantile Transfer for Reliable Operating Point Selection in Visual Place Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual Place Recognition (VPR) is a key component for localization in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)-denied environments, but its performance critically depends on selecting an image matching threshold (operating point) that balances precision and recall. Thresholds are typically hand-tuned offline for a specific environment and fixed during deployment, leading to degraded performance under environmental change. We propose a method that automatically estimates the operating point of a VPR system to maximize recall whilst aiming to achieve 100% precision. The method uses a small calibration traversal with known correspondences and transfers thresholds to deployment via quantile normalization of similarity score distributions. This quantile transfer ensures that thresholds remain stable across calibration sizes and query subsets. Experiments with seven state-of-the-art VPR techniques across five benchmark datasets demonstrate that our proposed approach consistently outperforms existing baselines, enabling the underlying VPR technique to operate at 100% precision in approximately twice as many deployment scenarios (median improvement), while retrieving up to 29% more correct matches at that precision. The method eliminates manual tuning by adapting to new environments and generalizing across operating conditions. Our code is available at https://github.com/DhyeyR-007/Quantile-Transfer-for-Reliable-VPR.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.
Builds on
21 of 45 references.
References · 21
- 2015NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognitioncited by 935
- 2016Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Agecited by 405
- 2022Rethinking Visual Geo-localization for Large-Scale Applicationscited by 160
- 2023MixVPR: Feature Mixing for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 160
- 2023Optimal Transport Aggregation for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 151
- 2023EigenPlaces: Training Viewpoint Robust Models for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 109
- 2020VPR-Bench: An Open-Source Visual Place Recognition Evaluation Framework with Quantifiable Viewpoint and Appearance Changecited by 101
- 2022Deep Visual Geo-localization Benchmarkcited by 83
- 2021Where is your place, Visual Place Recognition?cited by 82
- 2024BoQ: A Place is Worth a Bag of Learnable Queriescited by 63
- 2024CricaVPR: Cross-image Correlation-aware Representation Learning for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 61
- 2025MegaLoc: One Retrieval to Place Them Allcited by 58
9 more
- 2024General Place Recognition Survey: Towards Real-World Autonomycited by 23
- 2024On the Estimation of Image-matching Uncertainty in Visual Place Recognitioncited by 15
- 2021What makes visual place recognition easy or hard?cited by 14
- 2023Applications of Spiking Neural Networks in Visual Place Recognitioncited by 9
- 2024Improving Visual Place Recognition Based Robot Navigation By Verifying Localization Estimatescited by 7
- 2021Beyond ANN: Exploiting Structural Knowledge for Efficient Place Recognitioncited by 6
- 2023Unsupervised Quality Prediction for Improved Single-Frame and Weighted Sequential Visual Place Recognitioncited by 4
- 2025Improving Visual Place Recognition with Sequence-Matching Receptiveness Predictioncited by 4
- 2019Automatic Coverage Selection for Surface-Based Visual Localizationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.