Adversarial Attacks and Detection in Visual Place Recognition for Safer Robot Navigation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Stand-alone Visual Place Recognition (VPR) systems have little defence against a well-designed adversarial attack, which can lead to disastrous consequences when deployed for robot navigation. This paper extensively analyzes the effect of four adversarial attacks common in other perception tasks and four novel VPR-specific attacks on VPR localization performance. We then propose how to close the loop between VPR, an Adversarial Attack Detector (AAD), and active navigation decisions by demonstrating the performance benefit of simulated AADs in a novel experiment paradigm -- which we detail for the robotics community to use as a system framework. In the proposed experiment paradigm, we see the addition of AADs across a range of detection accuracies can improve performance over baseline; demonstrating a significant improvement -- such as a ~50% reduction in the mean along-track localization error -- can be achieved with True Positive and False Positive detection rates of only 75% and up to 25% respectively. We examine a variety of metrics including: Along-Track Error, Percentage of Time Attacked, Percentage of Time in an `Unsafe' State, and Longest Continuous Time Under Attack. Expanding further on these results, we provide the first investigation into the efficacy of the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) adversarial attack for VPR. The analysis in this work highlights the need for AADs in real-world systems for trustworthy navigation, and informs quantitative requirements for system design.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2025.
Builds on
21 of 40 references.
References · 21
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 988
- 2015NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognitioncited by 941
- 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 383
- 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
- 2016A study of the effect of JPG compression on adversarial imagescited by 197
- 2019Learning with Average Precision: Training Image Retrieval with a Listwise Losscited by 185
- 2023AnyLoc: Towards Universal Visual Place Recognitioncited by 163
- 2023MixVPR: Feature Mixing for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 161
- 2019Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 152
- 2023Optimal Transport Aggregation for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 152
9 more
- 2020VPR-Bench: An Open-Source Visual Place Recognition Evaluation Framework with Quantifiable Viewpoint and Appearance Changecited by 101
- 2021Where is your place, Visual Place Recognition?cited by 82
- 2016Adversarial Examples Detection in Deep Networks with Convolutional Filter Statisticscited by 77
- 2019Role of Spatial Context in Adversarial Robustness for Object Detectioncited by 35
- 2021Hyperdimensional computing as a framework for systematic aggregation of image descriptorscited by 32
- 2024On the Estimation of Image-matching Uncertainty in Visual Place Recognitioncited by 16
- 2020Fast and Robust Bio-inspired Teach and Repeat Navigationcited by 13
- 2024Improving Visual Place Recognition Based Robot Navigation By Verifying Localization Estimatescited by 8
- 2023Unsupervised Quality Prediction for Improved Single-Frame and Weighted Sequential Visual Place Recognitioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.