mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Boosting Performance of a Baseline Visual Place Recognition Technique by Predicting the Maximally Complementary Technique

arXiv 2210.07509 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2022cs.CV cs.ROcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One recent promising approach to the Visual Place Recognition (VPR) problem has been to fuse the place recognition estimates of multiple complementary VPR techniques using methods such as SRAL and multi-process fusion. These approaches come with a substantial practical limitation: they require all potential VPR methods to be brute-force run before they are selectively fused. The obvious solution to this limitation is to predict the viable subset of methods ahead of time, but this is challenging because it requires a predictive signal within the imagery itself that is indicative of high performance methods. Here we propose an alternative approach that instead starts with a known single base VPR technique, and learns to predict the most complementary additional VPR technique to fuse with it, that results in the largest improvement in performance. The key innovation here is to use a dimensionally reduced difference vector between the query image and the top-retrieved reference image using this baseline technique as the predictive signal of the most complementary additional technique, both during training and inference. We demonstrate that our approach can train a single network to select performant, complementary technique pairs across datasets which span multiple modes of transportation (train, car, walking) as well as to generalise to unseen datasets, outperforming multiple baseline strategies for manually selecting the best technique pairs based on the same training data.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2022.

Builds on

18 of 39 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognitioncited by 935
  2. 2016Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Agecited by 405
  3. 2019Learning with Average Precision: Training Image Retrieval with a Listwise Losscited by 184
  4. 2022Rethinking Visual Geo-localization for Large-Scale Applicationscited by 160
  5. 2020VPR-Bench: An Open-Source Visual Place Recognition Evaluation Framework with Quantifiable Viewpoint and Appearance Changecited by 101
  6. 2017Deep Learning Features at Scale for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 96
  7. 2021Where is your place, Visual Place Recognition?cited by 82
  8. 2015On the Performance of ConvNet Features for Place Recognitioncited by 72
  9. 2018A Holistic Visual Place Recognition Approach using Lightweight CNNs for Significant ViewPoint and Appearance Changescited by 53
  10. 2019Multi-Process Fusion: Visual Place Recognition Using Multiple Image Processing Methodscited by 38
  11. 2018Lightweight Unsupervised Deep Loop Closurecited by 32
  12. 2020Hierarchical Multi-Process Fusion for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 24
6 more
  1. 2020Intelligent Reference Curation for Visual Place Recognition via Bayesian Selective Fusioncited by 17
  2. 2021Improving Visual Place Recognition Performance by Maximising Complementaritycited by 15
  3. 2020Unsupervised Learning Methods for Visual Place Recognition in Discretely and Continuously Changing Environmentscited by 14
  4. 2021What makes visual place recognition easy or hard?cited by 14
  5. 2021Spiking Neural Networks for Visual Place Recognition via Weighted Neuronal Assignmentscited by 14
  6. 2019Filter Early, Match Late: Improving Network-Based Visual Place Recognitioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

3 papers.