On the Low-Rank Parametrization of Reward Models for Controlled Language Generation
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models trained on large amounts of data are known to produce inappropriate content in some cases and require careful tuning to be used in the real world. We revisit an effective and modular approach for controllability of the language models, when an external expert model guides the decoding. Particularly, we zoom in into the parametrization choice of an external expert, highlighting the difference between low-rank and higher-rank parametrizations. Higher-rank experts are designed to support high flexibility when representing the rewards, leading to higher computational costs during decoding. However, we demonstrate that they might not use their full flexibility. By analyzing the recently proposed reward-augmented decoding approach (RAD), which uses a higher-rank expert model, we introduce a simpler but more efficient low-rank parametrization of the expert model enabling fast and effective guided decoding. We empirically show that the low-rank RAD performs on par with the more flexible RAD on a detoxification and a sentiment control task, while requiring only a single reward model call per generated token.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 44 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2024.
Builds on
44 of 57 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts18 Jun
- 2023Reward-Augmented Decoding: Efficient Controlled Text Generation With a Unidirectional Reward Model14 Oct
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
Other references · 41
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
29 more
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
- 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 793
- 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
- 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 754
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
- 2024TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Modelcited by 604
- 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
- 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
- 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 434
- 2020GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generationcited by 377
- 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 374
- 2022Quark: Controllable Text Generation with Reinforced Unlearningcited by 236
- 2018Delete, Retrieve, Generate: A Simple Approach to Sentiment and Style Transfercited by 191
- 2022A New Generation of Perspective API: Efficient Multilingual Character-level Transformerscited by 181
- 2017Breaking the Softmax Bottleneck: A High-Rank RNN Language Modelcited by 147
- 2023HelpSteer: Multi-attribute Helpfulness Dataset for SteerLMcited by 140
- 2023Controlled Decoding from Language Modelscited by 133
- 2014Matrix Completion and Low-Rank SVD via Fast Alternating Least Squarescited by 104
- 2019Transforming Delete, Retrieve, Generate Approach for Controlled Text Style Transfercited by 81
- 2023Controlled Text Generation via Language Model Arithmeticcited by 51
- 2024Value Augmented Sampling for Language Model Alignment and Personalizationcited by 49
- 2022On the Blind Spots of Model-Based Evaluation Metrics for Text Generationcited by 48
- 2024Transfer Q Star: Principled Decoding for LLM Alignmentcited by 46
- 2023Closing the Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 30
- 2023Systematic Rectification of Language Models via Dead-end Analysiscited by 16
- 2019Breaking the Softmax Bottleneck via Learnable Monotonic Pointwise Non-linearitiescited by 12
- 2023VA-learning as a more efficient alternative to Q-learningcited by 11
- 2022Classifiers are Better Experts for Controllable Text Generationcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Robust Reward Modeling for Large Language Models via Causal Decomposition
- 2026The Missing Piece in Pre-trained Model Evaluation: Reward-Guided Decoding Unlocks Task-Oriented Behavior Without Parameter Updates
- 2025reWordBench: Benchmarking and Improving the Robustness of Reward Models with Transformed Inputs
- 2025RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Models
- 2022Critic-Guided Decoding for Controlled Text Generation
- 2025GRAM: A Generative Foundation Reward Model for Reward Generalization
- 2025Sailing by the Stars: A Survey on Reward Models and Learning Strategies for Learning from Rewards
- 2024A Critical Look At Tokenwise Reward-Guided Text Generation