mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Classifiers are Better Experts for Controllable Text Generation

arXiv 2205.07276 ↗First posted 15 May 2022cs.CL cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper proposes a simple method for controllable text generation based on weighting logits with a free-form classifier, namely CAIF sampling. Using an arbitrary text classifier, we adjust a small part of a language model's logits and guide text generation towards or away from classifier prediction. We experimented with toxicity avoidance and sentiment control tasks and showed that the proposed method significantly outperforms recent PPLM, GeDi, and DExperts on PPL and task accuracy metrics based on the external classifier of generated texts. In addition, compared to other approaches, it is easier to implement and tune and has significantly fewer restrictions and requirements.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2022.

Builds on

9 of 12 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  2. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  3. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  4. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 793
  5. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 754
  6. 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 434
  7. 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 414
  8. 2020GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generationcited by 377
  9. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 374

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

10 papers.