mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Missing Piece in Pre-trained Model Evaluation: Reward-Guided Decoding Unlocks Task-Oriented Behavior Without Parameter Updates

arXiv 2605.28020 ↗First posted 27 May 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid progress of large language models (LLMs), reliably evaluating the capabilities of pre-trained LLMs has become increasingly important. The challenge is that base pre-trained models are optimized for next-token prediction and often fail to follow instructions or produce well-formed answers under standard prompting and direct decoding. As a result, benchmark performance can conflate model capability with decoding-induced failures to produce task-oriented outputs, while exposing such behavior often relies on costly post-training. Recent decodingonly approaches attempt to reshape output distributions, but such methods can be inefficient and brittle across open-ended tasks. To address these limitations, we propose Energy-Based Decoding (EBD), a training-free, reward-guided framework for activating task-oriented behaviors from frozen pre-trained LLMs across both open-ended and objective tasks. EBD augments decoding with an external lightweight reward model, steering generations toward high-utility responses while anchoring them to the pre-trained model prior through a reward-tilted target distribution. We show that EBD shifts base-model outputs toward more instructionfollowing behavior, increasing behavioral similarity to post-trained counterparts and enabling a fairer inference-time evaluation of accessible pre-trained-model behavior. Empirically, EBD outperforms baselines across five models and six benchmarks, improving Qwen3-8B-Base on AlpacaEval2.0 from 8.8 to 44.5, reducing Mistral-7B Math500 latency by 18.9x relative to prior decoding work, and remaining robust to reward-model size.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 27 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

Builds on

27 of 47 references.

References · 27

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  6. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  7. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  8. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  9. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  10. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  11. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  12. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
15 more
  1. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  2. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  3. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
  4. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
  5. 2024Turning Up the Heat: Min-p Sampling for Creative and Coherent LLM Outputscited by 148
  6. 2020A Distributional Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 117
  7. 2020Residual Energy-Based Models for Text Generationcited by 95
  8. 2025WritingBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Generative Writingcited by 95
  9. 2025Olmo 3cited by 95
  10. 2025Reasoning with Sampling: Your Base Model is Smarter Than You Thinkcited by 84
  11. 2025Efficient Agents: Building Effective Agents While Reducing Costcited by 32
  12. 2025Every FLOP Counts: Scaling a 300B Mixture-of-Experts LING LLM without Premium GPUscited by 22
  13. 2025Plantain: Plan-Answer Interleaved Reasoningcited by 5
  14. 2026Do Instruction-Tuned Models Always Perform Better Than Base Models? Evidence from Math and Domain-Shifted Benchmarkscited by 4
  15. 2026Cognitive Training for Language Models: Towards General Capabilities via Cross-Entropy Gamescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Sailing by the Stars: A Survey on Reward Models and Learning Strategies for Learning from Rewards
  2. 2026Robust Reward Modeling for Large Language Models via Causal Decomposition
  3. 2026SyRuP: Enhancing System-Prompt Following via Reward-Guided Prediction in LLM Decoding
  4. 2024On the Low-Rank Parametrization of Reward Models for Controlled Language Generation
  5. 2026Small Reward Models via Backward Inference
  6. 2025Tiny Reward Models
  7. 2026Sampling for Quality: Training-Free Reward-Guided LLM Decoding via Sequential Monte Carlo
  8. 2025Rethinking Reward Models for Multi-Domain Test-Time Scaling