VA-learning as a more efficient alternative to Q-learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In reinforcement learning, the advantage function is critical for policy improvement, but is often extracted from a learned Q-function. A natural question is: Why not learn the advantage function directly? In this work, we introduce VA-learning, which directly learns advantage function and value function using bootstrapping, without explicit reference to Q-functions. VA-learning learns off-policy and enjoys similar theoretical guarantees as Q-learning. Thanks to the direct learning of advantage function and value function, VA-learning improves the sample efficiency over Q-learning both in tabular implementations and deep RL agents on Atari-57 games. We also identify a close connection between VA-learning and the dueling architecture, which partially explains why a simple architectural change to DQN agents tends to improve performance.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2023.
Builds on
9 of 19 references.
References · 9
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
- 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
- 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
- 2016Sample Efficient Actor-Critic with Experience Replaycited by 185
- 2015Increasing the Action Gap: New Operators for Reinforcement Learningcited by 49
- 2021Direct Advantage Estimationcited by 11
- 2019Gap-Increasing Policy Evaluation for Efficient and Noise-Tolerant Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
11 papers.
- 2023Generative Flow Networks as Entropy-Regularized RLcited by 60
- 2024Value Augmented Sampling for Language Model Alignment and Personalizationcited by 49
- 2025Soft Policy Optimization: Online Off-Policy RL for Sequence Modelscited by 12
- 2024Action Gaps and Advantages in Continuous-Time Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2024On the Low-Rank Parametrization of Reward Models for Controlled Language Generationcited by 3
- 2025An Analysis of Action-Value Temporal-Difference Methods That Learn State Valuescited by 2
- 2025Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Greenhouse Gas Offset Credit Marketscited by 1
- 2026Direct Advantage Estimation for Scalable and Sample-efficient Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Accelerating Q-learning through Efficient Value-Sharing across Actionscited by 0
- 2026Spectral Analysis of Dueling Q-Learningcited by 0
- 2026Endpoint Replay: Compressing the Recency Buffer in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Endpoint Replay: Compressing the Recency Buffer in Deep Reinforcement Learning27 Jul 2026
- 2026Spectral Analysis of Dueling Q-Learning9 Jul 2026
- 2026Accelerating Q-learning through Efficient Value-Sharing across Actions29 Jun 2026
- 2026Direct Advantage Estimation for Scalable and Sample-efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning18 Jun 2026
- 2025An Analysis of Action-Value Temporal-Difference Methods That Learn State Values13 Jul 2025
- 2025Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Greenhouse Gas Offset Credit Markets15 Apr 2025
- 2025Soft Policy Optimization: Online Off-Policy RL for Sequence Models7 Mar 2025
- 2024Action Gaps and Advantages in Continuous-Time Distributional Reinforcement Learning14 Oct 2024
- 2024On the Low-Rank Parametrization of Reward Models for Controlled Language Generation5 Jul 2024
- 2024Value Augmented Sampling for Language Model Alignment and Personalization10 May 2024
- 2023Generative Flow Networks as Entropy-Regularized RL19 Oct 2023