mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking and Red-Teaming Protective Perturbation in Personalized Diffusion Models

arXiv 2406.18944 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.CRcited by 4

On the map: Diffusion models → Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Personalized diffusion models (PDMs) have become prominent for adapting pre-trained text-to-image models to generate images of specific subjects using minimal training data. However, PDMs are susceptible to minor adversarial perturbations, leading to significant degradation when fine-tuned on corrupted datasets. These vulnerabilities are exploited to create protective perturbations that prevent unauthorized image generation. Existing purification methods attempt to red-team the protective perturbation to break the protection but often over-purify images, resulting in information loss. In this work, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the fine-tuning process of PDMs through the lens of shortcut learning. We hypothesize and empirically demonstrate that adversarial perturbations induce a latent-space misalignment between images and their text prompts in the CLIP embedding space. This misalignment causes the model to erroneously associate noisy patterns with unique identifiers during fine-tuning, resulting in poor generalization. Based on these insights, we propose a systematic red-teaming framework that includes data purification and contrastive decoupling learning. We first employ off-the-shelf image restoration techniques to realign images with their original semantic content in latent space. Then, we introduce contrastive decoupling learning with noise tokens to decouple the learning of personalized concepts from spurious noise patterns. Our study not only uncovers shortcut learning vulnerabilities in PDMs but also provides a thorough evaluation framework for developing stronger protection. Our extensive evaluation demonstrates its advantages over existing purification methods and its robustness against adaptive perturbations.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 26 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2024.

Builds on

26 of 62 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Can Protective Perturbation Safeguard Personal Data from Being Exploited by Stable Diffusion?30 Nov
  2. 2023EditShield: Protecting Unauthorized Image Editing by Instruction-guided Diffusion Models19 Nov
  3. 2023IMPRESS: Evaluating the Resilience of Imperceptible Perturbations Against Unauthorized Data Usage in Diffusion-Based Generative AI30 Oct
  4. 2023Toward effective protection against diffusion based mimicry through score distillation2 Oct
  5. 2023Anti-DreamBooth: Protecting users from personalized text-to-image synthesis27 Mar
  6. 2023Adversarial Example Does Good: Preventing Painting Imitation from Diffusion Models via Adversarial Examples9 Feb

Other references · 20

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  3. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  5. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  6. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  7. 2021SDEdit: Guided Image Synthesis and Editing with Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 1,937
  8. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
  9. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  10. 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 914
  11. 2019Deep Learning for Image Super-resolution: A Surveycited by 369
  12. 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 280
8 more
  1. 2015Large-scale Classification of Fine-Art Paintings: Learning The Right Metric on The Right Featurecited by 182
  2. 2023On the Foundations of Shortcut Learningcited by 65
  3. 2017Synthesizing Robust Adversarial Examplescited by 39
  4. 2023Backdoor Defense via Deconfounded Representation Learningcited by 38
  5. 2023Stable Unlearnable Example: Enhancing the Robustness of Unlearnable Examples via Stable Error-Minimizing Noisecited by 25
  6. 2023Improving Interpretation Faithfulness for Vision Transformerscited by 12
  7. 2024Medical Unlearnable Examples: Securing Medical Data from Unauthorized Training via Sparsity-Aware Local Maskingcited by 8
  8. 2023Securing Biomedical Images from Unauthorized Training with Anti-Learning Perturbationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Latent Diffusion Unlearning: Protecting Against Unauthorized Personalization Through Trajectory Shifted Perturbations
  2. 2025PersGuard: Preventing Malicious Personalization in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Model Backdoors
  3. 2025CAT: Contrastive Adversarial Training for Evaluating the Robustness of Protective Perturbations in Latent Diffusion Models
  4. 2025Adversarial Concept Distillation for One-Step Diffusion Personalization
  5. 2025Perturb a Model, Not an Image: Towards Robust Privacy Protection via Anti-Personalized Diffusion Models
  6. 2024Perturbing Attention Gives You More Bang for the Buck: Subtle Imaging Perturbations That Efficiently Fool Customized Diffusion Models
  7. 2024Protective Perturbations against Unauthorized Data Usage in Diffusion-based Image Generation
  8. 2025Preserve and Personalize: Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Models without Distributional Drift