mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PersGuard: Preventing Malicious Personalization in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Model Backdoors

arXiv 2502.16167 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Diffusion models → Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Diffusion models (DMs) have advanced text-to-image (T2I) synthesis, yet their personalization capabilities raise serious privacy and copyright concerns. Malicious actors can misuse these models to generate unauthorized portraits or artistic style replicas. Existing proactive defenses primarily rely on applying adversarial perturbations to reference images to disrupt training. However, these approaches face limitations: they assume all training images are pre-perturbed and are prone to failure when datasets contain unperturbed images or undergo minor data transformations. In this paper, we introduce PersGuard, a novel backdoor-based framework designed to prevent unauthorized personalization of pre-trained T2I diffusion models. Unlike perturbation-based methods, we assume protectors can embed protective backdoors into the models before their release. This mechanism ensures that if a downstream user fine-tunes the model on protected images, the model retains the backdoor and generates predefined protective outputs; conversely, for unprotected images, the backdoor is effectively removed during fine-tuning to ensure normal model utility. We formulate the backdoor injection as a unified optimization problem incorporating three objectives: a backdoor behavior loss to activate protection, a prior preservation loss to maintain standard generation capabilities, and a novel backdoor retention loss. The retention loss is specifically designed to mirror personalization loss, ensuring the backdoor remains robust during downstream fine-tuning. Extensive experiments across gray-box and black-box settings, multi-object protection, and facial identity protection demonstrate that PersGuard provides superior privacy protection compared to existing perturbation-based methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 46 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2025.

Builds on

46 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Towards Reliable Verification of Unauthorized Data Usage in Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Models14 Oct
  2. 2024Prompt-Agnostic Adversarial Perturbation for Customized Diffusion Models20 Aug
  3. 2024DDAP: Dual-Domain Anti-Personalization against Text-to-Image Diffusion Models29 Jul
  4. 2024Disrupting Diffusion: Token-Level Attention Erasure Attack against Diffusion-based Customization31 May
  5. 2023SimAC: A Simple Anti-Customization Method for Protecting Face Privacy against Text-to-Image Synthesis of Diffusion Models13 Dec
  6. 2023MetaCloak: Preventing Unauthorized Subject-driven Text-to-image Diffusion-based Synthesis via Meta-learning22 Nov
  7. 2023DUAW: Data-free Universal Adversarial Watermark against Stable Diffusion Customization19 Aug
  8. 2023Personalization as a Shortcut for Few-Shot Backdoor Attack against Text-to-Image Diffusion Models18 May
  9. 2023Text-to-Image Diffusion Models can be Easily Backdoored through Multimodal Data Poisoning7 May
  10. 2023Anti-DreamBooth: Protecting users from personalized text-to-image synthesis27 Mar
  11. 2023Adversarial Example Does Good: Preventing Painting Imitation from Diffusion Models via Adversarial Examples9 Feb

Other references · 35

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
  5. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  6. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
  7. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  8. 2021GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 3,595
  9. 2022DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generationcited by 3,286
  10. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
  11. 2022Video Diffusion Modelscited by 2,280
  12. 2022An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversioncited by 2,231
23 more
  1. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  2. 2022Diffusion-LM Improves Controllable Text Generationcited by 1,006
  3. 2022eDiff-I: Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with an Ensemble of Expert Denoiserscited by 921
  4. 2023SVDiff: Compact Parameter Space for Diffusion Fine-Tuningcited by 338
  5. 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 334
  6. 2022What the DAAM: Interpreting Stable Diffusion Using Cross Attentioncited by 233
  7. 2023HyperDreamBooth: HyperNetworks for Fast Personalization of Text-to-Image Modelscited by 224
  8. 2021Unlearnable Examples: Making Personal Data Unexploitablecited by 188
  9. 2021Poisoning and Backdooring Contrastive Learningcited by 149
  10. 2022ProDiff: Progressive Fast Diffusion Model For High-Quality Text-to-Speechcited by 147
  11. 2023BadCLIP: Dual-Embedding Guided Backdoor Attack on Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 112
  12. 2022Rickrolling the Artist: Injecting Backdoors into Text Encoders for Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 59
  13. 2023Detecting Backdoors in Pre-trained Encoderscited by 53
  14. 2021Data Poisoning Won't Save You From Facial Recognitioncited by 45
  15. 2022BadDet: Backdoor Attacks on Object Detectioncited by 45
  16. 2019Gotta Catch 'Em All: Using Honeypots to Catch Adversarial Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 40
  17. 2023BAGM: A Backdoor Attack for Manipulating Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 37
  18. 2022Untargeted Backdoor Attack against Object Detectioncited by 28
  19. 2020BAAAN: Backdoor Attacks Against Autoencoder and GAN-Based Machine Learning Modelscited by 23
  20. 2024Multimodal Unlearnable Examples: Protecting Data against Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 21
  21. 2022Watermark Vaccine: Adversarial Attacks to Prevent Watermark Removalcited by 18
  22. 2023IMMA: Immunizing text-to-image Models against Malicious Adaptationcited by 17
  23. 2025Detecting Backdoor Samples in Contrastive Language Image Pretrainingcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Perturb a Model, Not an Image: Towards Robust Privacy Protection via Anti-Personalized Diffusion Models
  2. 2025Practical, Generalizable and Robust Backdoor Attacks on Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  3. 2025Latent Diffusion Unlearning: Protecting Against Unauthorized Personalization Through Trajectory Shifted Perturbations
  4. 2025GuardDoor: Safeguarding Against Malicious Diffusion Editing via Protective Backdoors
  5. 2024Protective Perturbations against Unauthorized Data Usage in Diffusion-based Image Generation
  6. 2024Rethinking and Red-Teaming Protective Perturbation in Personalized Diffusion Models
  7. 2024Defending Text-to-image Diffusion Models: Surprising Efficacy of Textual Perturbations Against Backdoor Attacks
  8. 2023Can Protective Perturbation Safeguard Personal Data from Being Exploited by Stable Diffusion?