mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Interpretation Faithfulness for Vision Transformers

arXiv 2311.17983 ↗First posted 29 Nov 2023cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision Transformers (ViTs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance for various vision tasks. One reason behind the success lies in their ability to provide plausible innate explanations for the behavior of neural architectures. However, ViTs suffer from issues with explanation faithfulness, as their focal points are fragile to adversarial attacks and can be easily changed with even slight perturbations on the input image. In this paper, we propose a rigorous approach to mitigate these issues by introducing Faithful ViTs (FViTs). Briefly speaking, an FViT should have the following two properties: (1) The top-k indices of its self-attention vector should remain mostly unchanged under input perturbation, indicating stable explanations; (2) The prediction distribution should be robust to perturbations. To achieve this, we propose a new method called Denoised Diffusion Smoothing (DDS), which adopts randomized smoothing and diffusion-based denoising. We theoretically prove that processing ViTs directly with DDS can turn them into FViTs. We also show that Gaussian noise is nearly optimal for both ℓ2 and ℓ_∞-norm cases. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through comprehensive experiments and evaluations. Results show that FViTs are more robust against adversarial attacks while maintaining the explainability of attention, indicating higher faithfulness.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2023.

Builds on

53 of 60 references.

References · 53

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  6. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  7. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  8. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  9. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  10. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  11. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  12. 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,761
38 more
  1. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,422
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  3. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  4. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,423
  5. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,369
  6. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  7. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  8. 2020Pre-Trained Image Processing Transformercited by 893
  9. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
  10. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
  11. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
  12. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
  13. 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 476
  14. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  15. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
  16. 2021FNet: Mixing Tokens with Fourier Transformscited by 347
  17. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 333
  18. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
  19. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
  20. 2015Explaining NonLinear Classification Decisions with Deep Taylor Decompositioncited by 250
  21. 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 238
  22. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 216
  23. 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 207
  24. 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 199
  25. 2021Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?cited by 187
  26. 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 180
  27. 2018Tell Me Where to Look: Guided Attention Inference Networkcited by 169
  28. 2021On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examplescited by 167
  29. 2022Understanding The Robustness in Vision Transformerscited by 144
  30. 2021Towards Robust Vision Transformercited by 137
  31. 2022(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!cited by 132
  32. 2022Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Surveycited by 130
  33. 2018L-Shapley and C-Shapley: Efficient Model Interpretation for Structured Datacited by 100
  34. 2015Between Pure and Approximate Differential Privacycited by 56
  35. 2017The Promise and Peril of Human Evaluation for Model Interpretabilitycited by 52
  36. 2021Certified Patch Robustness via Smoothed Vision Transformerscited by 45
  37. 2016End-to-end training of object class detectors for mean average precisioncited by 35
  38. 2021On the Sensitivity and Stability of Model Interpretations in NLPcited by 30

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

12 papers.