mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Native Design Bias: Studying the Impact of English Nativeness on Language Model Performance

arXiv 2406.17385 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at providing information acquired during pretraining on large-scale corpora and following instructions through user prompts. This study investigates whether the quality of LLM responses varies depending on the demographic profile of users. Considering English as the global lingua franca, along with the diversity of its dialects among speakers of different native languages, we explore whether non-native English speakers receive lower-quality or even factually incorrect responses from LLMs more frequently. Our results show that performance discrepancies occur when LLMs are prompted by native versus non-native English speakers and persist when comparing native speakers from Western countries with others. Additionally, we find a strong anchoring effect when the model recognizes or is made aware of the user's nativeness, which further degrades the response quality when interacting with non-native speakers. Our analysis is based on a newly collected dataset with over 12,000 unique annotations from 124 annotators, including information on their native language and English proficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2024.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  2. 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 820
  3. 2020The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP Worldcited by 789
  4. 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 778
  5. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  6. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
  7. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
  8. 2023Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Modelscited by 424
  9. 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 356
  10. 2023Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes in Language Modelscited by 204
  11. 2023ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Learningcited by 203
  12. 2023Bias Runs Deep: Implicit Reasoning Biases in Persona-Assigned LLMscited by 191
13 more
  1. 2021RedditBias: A Real-World Resource for Bias Evaluation and Debiasing of Conversational Language Modelscited by 149
  2. 2021Systematic Inequalities in Language Technology Performance across the World's Languagescited by 118
  3. 2023Don't Trust ChatGPT when Your Question is not in English: A Study of Multilingual Abilities and Types of LLMscited by 103
  4. 2022Capturing Failures of Large Language Models via Human Cognitive Biasescited by 97
  5. 2023NLPositionality: Characterizing Design Biases of Datasets and Modelscited by 91
  6. 2023Sensitivity, Performance, Robustness: Deconstructing the Effect of Sociodemographic Promptingcited by 80
  7. 2024Unintended Impacts of LLM Alignment on Global Representationcited by 66
  8. 2022A Systematic Study of Bias Amplificationcited by 65
  9. 2022Whose Language Counts as High Quality? Measuring Language Ideologies in Text Data Selectioncited by 52
  10. 2022Multi-VALUE: A Framework for Cross-Dialectal English NLPcited by 51
  11. 2022Fewer Errors, but More Stereotypes? The Effect of Model Size on Gender Biascited by 33
  12. 2022Model Positionality and Computational Reflexivity: Promoting Reflexivity in Data Sciencecited by 13
  13. 2023Zero-shot Approach to Overcome Perturbation Sensitivity of Promptscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.