The AI Gap: How Socioeconomic Status Affects Language Technology Interactions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Socioeconomic status (SES) fundamentally influences how people interact with each other and more recently, with digital technologies like Large Language Models (LLMs). While previous research has highlighted the interaction between SES and language technology, it was limited by reliance on proxy metrics and synthetic data. We survey 1,000 individuals from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds about their use of language technologies and generative AI, and collect 6,482 prompts from their previous interactions with LLMs. We find systematic differences across SES groups in language technology usage (i.e., frequency, performed tasks), interaction styles, and topics. Higher SES entails a higher level of abstraction, convey requests more concisely, and topics like 'inclusivity' and 'travel'. Lower SES correlates with higher anthropomorphization of LLMs (using ''hello'' and ''thank you'') and more concrete language. Our findings suggest that while generative language technologies are becoming more accessible to everyone, socioeconomic linguistic differences still stratify their use to exacerbate the digital divide. These differences underscore the importance of considering SES in developing language technologies to accommodate varying linguistic needs rooted in socioeconomic factors and limit the AI Gap across SES groups.
Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2025.
Builds on
14 of 51 references.
References · 14
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
- 2024The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 144
- 2025Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversationscited by 96
- 2023Rethinking Model Evaluation as Narrowing the Socio-Technical Gapcited by 56
- 2017An optimal transportation approach for assessing almost stochastic ordercited by 33
- 2022What a Creole Wants, What a Creole Needscited by 27
- 2024AnthroScore: A Computational Linguistic Measure of Anthropomorphismcited by 27
- 2024What Do Dialect Speakers Want? A Survey of Attitudes Towards Language Technology for German Dialectscited by 21
- 2023Artificial Intelligence across Europe: A Study on Awareness, Attitude and Trustcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 9.
15 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2026Lost in Simulation: LLM-Simulated Users are Unreliable Proxies for Human Users in Agentic Evaluationscited by 40
- 2025Anthropomimetic Uncertainty: What Verbalized Uncertainty in Language Models is Missingcited by 14
- 2026One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM Personalizationcited by 9
- 2025What Is The Political Content in LLMs' Pre- and Post-Training Data?cited by 7
- 2025Generative Interfaces for Language Modelscited by 6
- 2025NeoBabel: A Multilingual Open Tower for Visual Generationcited by 2
- 2025Generative AI Practices, Literacy, and Divides: An Empirical Analysis in the Italian Contextcited by 2
- 2026Topics as Proxies for Sociodemographics: How Conversational Context Affects LLM Answerscited by 2
- 2026Overreliance on AI in Information-seeking from Video Contentcited by 1
- 2025HiligayNER: A Baseline Named Entity Recognition Model for Hiligaynoncited by 0
- 2026Do Large Language Models Adapt to Language Variation across Socioeconomic Status?cited by 0
- 2026From Chatbots to Confidants: A Cross-Cultural Study of LLM Adoption for Emotional Supportcited by 0
3 more
- 2026What do Reward Models Memorize?cited by 0
- 2026It's How You Ask: Gender-Associated Linguistic Bias in LLMscited by 0
- 2026WildSEEK: Evaluating Language Models for Information-Seekingcited by 0
- 2026WildSEEK: Evaluating Language Models for Information-Seeking31 Aug 2026
- 2026It's How You Ask: Gender-Associated Linguistic Bias in LLMs13 Aug 2026
- 2026What do Reward Models Memorize?27 Jul 2026
- 2026Topics as Proxies for Sociodemographics: How Conversational Context Affects LLM Answers1 Jun 2026
- 2026From Chatbots to Confidants: A Cross-Cultural Study of LLM Adoption for Emotional Support28 Apr 2026
- 2026Overreliance on AI in Information-seeking from Video Content20 Mar 2026
- 2026Do Large Language Models Adapt to Language Variation across Socioeconomic Status?12 Feb 2026
- 2026One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM Personalization26 Jan 2026
- 2026Lost in Simulation: LLM-Simulated Users are Unreliable Proxies for Human Users in Agentic Evaluations23 Jan 2026
- 2025Generative AI Practices, Literacy, and Divides: An Empirical Analysis in the Italian Context3 Dec 2025
- 2025HiligayNER: A Baseline Named Entity Recognition Model for Hiligaynon12 Oct 2025
- 2025What Is The Political Content in LLMs' Pre- and Post-Training Data?26 Sep 2025
3 more
- 2026What do Reward Models Memorize?cited by 0
- 2026What do Reward Models Memorize?27 Jul 2026
- 2025Anthropomimetic Uncertainty: What Verbalized Uncertainty in Language Models is Missingcited by 14
- 2026One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM Personalizationcited by 9
- 2025What Is The Political Content in LLMs' Pre- and Post-Training Data?cited by 7
- 2025Generative Interfaces for Language Modelscited by 6
- 2025NeoBabel: A Multilingual Open Tower for Visual Generationcited by 2
- 2025Generative AI Practices, Literacy, and Divides: An Empirical Analysis in the Italian Contextcited by 2
- 2026Topics as Proxies for Sociodemographics: How Conversational Context Affects LLM Answerscited by 2
- 2026Overreliance on AI in Information-seeking from Video Contentcited by 1
- 2025HiligayNER: A Baseline Named Entity Recognition Model for Hiligaynoncited by 0
- 2026Do Large Language Models Adapt to Language Variation across Socioeconomic Status?cited by 0
- 2026From Chatbots to Confidants: A Cross-Cultural Study of LLM Adoption for Emotional Supportcited by 0
- 2026It's How You Ask: Gender-Associated Linguistic Bias in LLMscited by 0
12 most cited of 13 All 13 (JSON)
- 2026WildSEEK: Evaluating Language Models for Information-Seeking31 Aug 2026
- 2026It's How You Ask: Gender-Associated Linguistic Bias in LLMs13 Aug 2026
- 2026Topics as Proxies for Sociodemographics: How Conversational Context Affects LLM Answers1 Jun 2026
- 2026From Chatbots to Confidants: A Cross-Cultural Study of LLM Adoption for Emotional Support28 Apr 2026
- 2026Overreliance on AI in Information-seeking from Video Content20 Mar 2026
- 2026Do Large Language Models Adapt to Language Variation across Socioeconomic Status?12 Feb 2026
- 2026One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM Personalization26 Jan 2026
- 2025Generative AI Practices, Literacy, and Divides: An Empirical Analysis in the Italian Context3 Dec 2025
- 2025HiligayNER: A Baseline Named Entity Recognition Model for Hiligaynon12 Oct 2025
- 2025What Is The Political Content in LLMs' Pre- and Post-Training Data?26 Sep 2025
- 2025Generative Interfaces for Language Models26 Aug 2025
- 2025Anthropomimetic Uncertainty: What Verbalized Uncertainty in Language Models is Missing11 Jul 2025
12 newest of 13 All 13 (JSON)