Tolerance of Reinforcement Learning Controllers against Deviations in Cyber Physical Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cyber-physical systems (CPS) with reinforcement learning (RL)-based controllers are increasingly being deployed in complex physical environments such as autonomous vehicles, the Internet-of-Things(IoT), and smart cities. An important property of a CPS is tolerance; i.e., its ability to function safely under possible disturbances and uncertainties in the actual operation. In this paper, we introduce a new, expressive notion of tolerance that describes how well a controller is capable of satisfying a desired system requirement, specified using Signal Temporal Logic (STL), under possible deviations in the system. Based on this definition, we propose a novel analysis problem, called the tolerance falsification problem, which involves finding small deviations that result in a violation of the given requirement. We present a novel, two-layer simulation-based analysis framework and a novel search heuristic for finding small tolerance violations. To evaluate our approach, we construct a set of benchmark problems where system parameters can be configured to represent different types of uncertainties and disturbancesin the system. Our evaluation shows that our falsification approach and heuristic can effectively find small tolerance violations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2024.
Builds on
25 of 46 references.
References · 25
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
- 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 616
- 2016CAD2RL: Real Single-Image Flight without a Single Real Imagecited by 227
- 2022A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applicationscited by 169
- 2020A Survey of Algorithms for Black-Box Safety Validation of Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 71
- 2019Wasserstein Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
- 2018Policy Transfer with Strategy Optimizationcited by 41
13 more
- 2022On the Robustness of Safe Reinforcement Learning under Observational Perturbationscited by 38
- 2019Non-Stationary Markov Decision Processes, a Worst-Case Approach using Model-Based Reinforcement Learning, Extended versioncited by 36
- 2022Trustworthy Reinforcement Learning Against Intrinsic Vulnerabilities: Robustness, Safety, and Generalizabilitycited by 32
- 2017Compositional Falsification of Cyber-Physical Systems with Machine Learning Componentscited by 31
- 2019Arithmetic-Geometric Mean Robustness for Control from Signal Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 19
- 2019Control from Signal Temporal Logic Specifications with Smooth Cumulative Quantitative Semanticscited by 16
- 2018Quantifying the Reality Gap in Robotic Manipulation Taskscited by 14
- 2020Statistical Verification of Autonomous Systems using Surrogate Models and Conformal Inferencecited by 8
- 2021Part-X: A Family of Stochastic Algorithms for Search-Based Test Generation with Probabilistic Guaranteescited by 6
- 2024Safe Planning through Incremental Decomposition of Signal Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 6
- 2021PSY-TaLiRo: A Python Toolbox for Search-Based Test Generation for Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 5
- 2021When Cyber-Physical Systems Meet AI: A Benchmark, an Evaluation, and a Way Forwardcited by 5
- 2021STL Robustness Risk over Discrete-Time Stochastic Processescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.