Statistical Verification of Autonomous Systems using Surrogate Models and Conformal Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we propose conformal inference based approach for statistical verification of CPS models. Cyber-physical systems (CPS) such as autonomous vehicles, avionic systems, and medical devices operate in highly uncertain environments. This uncertainty is typically modeled using a finite number of parameters or input signals. Given a system specification in Signal Temporal Logic (STL), we would like to verify that for all (infinite) values of the model parameters/input signals, the system satisfies its specification. Unfortunately, this problem is undecidable in general. em Statistical model checking (SMC) offers a solution by providing guarantees on the correctness of CPS models by statistically reasoning on model simulations. We propose a new approach for statistical verification of CPS models for user-provided distribution on the model parameters. Our technique uses model simulations to learn em surrogate models, and uses em conformal inference to provide probabilistic guarantees on the satisfaction of a given STL property. Additionally, we can provide prediction intervals containing the quantitative satisfaction values of the given STL property for any user-specified confidence level. We also propose a refinement procedure based on Gaussian Process (GP)-based surrogate models for obtaining fine-grained probabilistic guarantees over sub-regions in the parameter space. This in turn enables the CPS designer to choose assured validity domains in the parameter space for safety-critical applications. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our technique on several CPS models.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023Distributionally Robust Statistical Verification with Imprecise Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2023How Safe Am I Given What I See? Calibrated Prediction of Safety Chances for Image-Controlled Autonomycited by 8
- 2022Testing Rare Downstream Safety Violations via Upstream Adaptive Sampling of Perception Error Modelscited by 7
- 2024Recursively Feasible Shrinking-Horizon MPC in Dynamic Environments with Conformal Prediction Guaranteescited by 4
- 2021Learning Spatio-Temporal Specifications for Dynamical Systemscited by 1
- 2024Tolerance of Reinforcement Learning Controllers against Deviations in Cyber Physical Systemscited by 1
- 2025How Safe Will I Be Given What I Saw? Calibrated Prediction of Safety Chances for Image-Controlled Autonomycited by 1
- 2026Conformal Signal Temporal Logic for Robust Reinforcement Learning Control: A Case Studycited by 1
- 2026Conformal Signal Temporal Logic for Robust Reinforcement Learning Control: A Case Study15 Feb 2026
- 2025How Safe Will I Be Given What I Saw? Calibrated Prediction of Safety Chances for Image-Controlled Autonomy12 Aug 2025
- 2024Tolerance of Reinforcement Learning Controllers against Deviations in Cyber Physical Systems24 Jun 2024
- 2024Recursively Feasible Shrinking-Horizon MPC in Dynamic Environments with Conformal Prediction Guarantees17 May 2024
- 2023Distributionally Robust Statistical Verification with Imprecise Neural Networks28 Aug 2023
- 2023How Safe Am I Given What I See? Calibrated Prediction of Safety Chances for Image-Controlled Autonomy23 Aug 2023
- 2022Testing Rare Downstream Safety Violations via Upstream Adaptive Sampling of Perception Error Models20 Sep 2022
- 2021Learning Spatio-Temporal Specifications for Dynamical Systems20 Dec 2021