mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models

arXiv 2406.04566 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Spatial reasoning is a crucial component of both biological and artificial intelligence. In this work, we present a comprehensive study of the capability of current state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on spatial reasoning. To support our study, we created and contribute a novel Spatial Reasoning Characterization (SpaRC) framework and Spatial Reasoning Paths (SpaRP) datasets, to enable an in-depth understanding of the spatial relations and compositions as well as the usefulness of spatial reasoning chains. We found that all the state-of-the-art LLMs do not perform well on the datasets -- their performances are consistently low across different setups. The spatial reasoning capability improves substantially as model sizes scale up. Finetuning both large language models (e.g., Llama-2-70B) and smaller ones (e.g., Llama-2-13B) can significantly improve their F1-scores by 7--32 absolute points. We also found that the top proprietary LLMs still significantly outperform their open-source counterparts in topological spatial understanding and reasoning.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2024.

Builds on

14 of 17 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Disentangling Extraction and Reasoning in Multi-hop Spatial Reasoning25 Oct
  2. 2022Transfer Learning with Synthetic Corpora for Spatial Role Labeling and Reasoning30 Oct
  3. 2022StepGame: A New Benchmark for Robust Multi-Hop Spatial Reasoning in Texts18 Apr

Other references · 11

  1. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  2. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  3. 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,013
  4. 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Modelcited by 846
  5. 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 309
  6. 2018Touchdown: Natural Language Navigation and Spatial Reasoning in Visual Street Environmentscited by 238
  7. 2023Deductive Verification of Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 122
  8. 2021SpartQA: : A Textual Question Answering Benchmark for Spatial Reasoningcited by 75
  9. 2023Coupling Large Language Models with Logic Programming for Robust and General Reasoning from Textcited by 59
  10. 2019A Natural Language Corpus of Common Grounding under Continuous and Partially-Observable Contextcited by 35
  11. 2020Spatial Reasoning from Natural Language Instructions for Robot Manipulationcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models
  2. 2025Stuck in the Matrix: Probing Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models
  3. 2024PLUGH: A Benchmark for Spatial Understanding and Reasoning in Large Language Models
  4. 2025SpatialScore: Towards Comprehensive Evaluation for Spatial Intelligence
  5. 2024Advancing Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models: An In-Depth Evaluation and Enhancement Using the StepGame Benchmark
  6. 2025Foundation Models for Geospatial Reasoning: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Understanding Geometries and Topological Spatial Relations
  7. 2024Can Large Language Models Create New Knowledge for Spatial Reasoning Tasks?
  8. 2024Can Large Language Models Reason about the Region Connection Calculus?