Saffron-1: Safety Inference Scaling
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing safety assurance research has primarily focused on training-phase alignment to instill safe behaviors into LLMs. However, recent studies have exposed these methods' susceptibility to diverse jailbreak attacks. Concurrently, inference scaling has significantly advanced LLM reasoning capabilities but remains unexplored in the context of safety assurance. Addressing this gap, our work pioneers inference scaling for robust and effective LLM safety against emerging threats. We reveal that conventional inference scaling techniques, despite their success in reasoning tasks, perform poorly in safety contexts, even falling short of basic approaches like Best-of-N Sampling. We attribute this inefficiency to a newly identified challenge, the exploration--efficiency dilemma, arising from the high computational overhead associated with frequent process reward model (PRM) evaluations. To overcome this dilemma, we propose SAFFRON, a novel inference scaling paradigm tailored explicitly for safety assurance. Central to our approach is the introduction of a multifurcation reward model (MRM) that significantly reduces the required number of reward model evaluations. To operationalize this paradigm, we further propose: (i) a partial supervision training objective for MRM, (ii) a conservative exploration constraint to prevent out-of-distribution explorations, and (iii) a Trie-based key--value caching strategy that facilitates cache sharing across sequences during tree search. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our method. Additionally, we publicly release our trained multifurcation reward model (Saffron-1) and the accompanying token-level safety reward dataset (Safety4M) to accelerate future research in LLM safety. Our code, model, and data are publicly available at https://github.com/q-rz/saffron , and our project homepage is at https://q-rz.github.io/p/saffron .
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 53 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2025.
Builds on
53 of 69 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safety2 Nov
- 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep10 Jun
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!5 Oct
Other references · 50
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
38 more
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
- 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,141
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 928
- 2022Efficiently Scaling Transformer Inferencecited by 539
- 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 499
- 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 486
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 415
- 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 327
- 2025From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 320
- 2024Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 290
- 2025RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoningcited by 154
- 2022DIMES: A Differentiable Meta Solver for Combinatorial Optimization Problemscited by 129
- 2024Theoretical guarantees on the best-of-n alignment policycited by 124
- 2024Discrete-state Continuous-time Diffusion for Graph Generationcited by 76
- 2024DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language Modelscited by 55
- 2023Bypassing the Safety Training of Open-Source LLMs with Priming Attackscited by 50
- 2024How Efficient is LLM-Generated Code? A Rigorous & High-Standard Benchmarkcited by 43
- 2024InfAlign: Inference-aware language model alignmentcited by 35
- 2023Networked Time Series Imputation via Position-aware Graph Enhanced Variational Autoencoderscited by 32
- 2023Class-Imbalanced Graph Learning without Class Rebalancingcited by 29
- 2023Ensuring User-side Fairness in Dynamic Recommender Systemscited by 27
- 2025Transformer Copilot: Learning from The Mistake Log in LLM Fine-tuningcited by 21
- 2024Logic Query of Thoughts: Guiding Large Language Models to Answer Complex Logic Queries with Knowledge Graphscited by 20
- 2024DeFT: Decoding with Flash Tree-attention for Efficient Tree-structured LLM Inferencecited by 19
- 2024BACKTIME: Backdoor Attacks on Multivariate Time Series Forecastingcited by 18
- 2025Pave Your Own Path: Graph Gradual Domain Adaptation on Fused Gromov-Wasserstein Geodesicscited by 17
- 2023Reconstructing Graph Diffusion History from a Single Snapshotcited by 13
- 2024Gradient Compressed Sensing: A Query-Efficient Gradient Estimator for High-Dimensional Zeroth-Order Optimizationcited by 12
- 2024WAPITI: A Watermark for Finetuned Open-Source LLMscited by 12
- 2025TUCKET: A Tensor Time Series Data Structure for Efficient and Accurate Factor Analysis over Time Rangescited by 12
- 2025Breaking Silos: Adaptive Model Fusion Unlocks Better Time Series Forecastingcited by 12
- 2024Fair Anomaly Detection For Imbalanced Groupscited by 10
- 2025Efficient Beam Search for Large Language Models Using Trie-Based Decodingcited by 10
- 2024AIM: Attributing, Interpreting, Mitigating Data Unfairnesscited by 9
- 2025Graph Data Selection for Domain Adaptation: A Model-Free Approachcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025RSafe: Incentivizing proactive reasoning to build robust and adaptive LLM safeguards
- 2025Safety is Not Only About Refusal: Reasoning-Enhanced Fine-tuning for Interpretable LLM Safety
- 2026Safety Paradox: How Enhanced Safety Awareness Leaves LLMs Vulnerable to Posterior Attack
- 2025Breaking the Safety-Capability Tradeoff: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Maintains Safety Guardrails in LLMs
- 2025Reasoning as an Adaptive Defense for Safety
- 2025When Models Outthink Their Safety: Unveiling and Mitigating Self-Jailbreak in Large Reasoning Models
- 2026Mitigating the Safety-utility Trade-off in LLM Alignment via Adaptive Safe Context Learning
- 2025Activation Approximations Can Incur Safety Vulnerabilities Even in Aligned LLMs: Comprehensive Analysis and Defense