mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Decoupling the Class Label and the Target Concept in Machine Unlearning

arXiv 2406.08288 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2024cs.LGcited by 12

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine unlearning as an emerging research topic for data regulations, aims to adjust a trained model to approximate a retrained one that excludes a portion of training data. Previous studies showed that class-wise unlearning is successful in forgetting the knowledge of a target class, through gradient ascent on the forgetting data or fine-tuning with the remaining data. However, while these methods are useful, they are insufficient as the class label and the target concept are often considered to coincide. In this work, we decouple them by considering the label domain mismatch and investigate three problems beyond the conventional all matched forgetting, e.g., target mismatch, model mismatch, and data mismatch forgetting. We systematically analyze the new challenges in restrictively forgetting the target concept and also reveal crucial forgetting dynamics in the representation level to realize these tasks. Based on that, we propose a general framework, namely, TARget-aware Forgetting (TARF). It enables the additional tasks to actively forget the target concept while maintaining the rest part, by simultaneously conducting annealed gradient ascent on the forgetting data and selected gradient descent on the hard-to-affect remaining data. Empirically, various experiments under the newly introduced settings are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of our TARF.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 38 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2024.

Builds on

38 of 55 references.

Closest ancestors · 12

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Challenging Forgets: Unveiling the Worst-Case Forget Sets in Machine Unlearning12 Mar
  2. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  3. 2023Unlearning via Sparse Representations26 Nov
  4. 2023SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generation19 Oct
  5. 2023Large Language Model Unlearning14 Oct
  6. 2023Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine Unlearning11 Apr
  7. 2022Few-Shot Unlearning by Model Inversion31 May
  8. 2021On the Necessity of Auditable Algorithmic Definitions for Machine Unlearning22 Oct
  9. 2021Unrolling SGD: Understanding Factors Influencing Machine Unlearning27 Sep
  10. 2021Machine Unlearning of Features and Labels26 Aug
  11. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar
  12. 2021Machine Unlearning via Algorithmic Stability25 Feb

Other references · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  7. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  8. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  9. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  10. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  11. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  12. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
14 more
  1. 2023Erasing Concepts from Diffusion Modelscited by 530
  2. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
  3. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
  4. 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 305
  5. 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 303
  6. 2023Forget-Me-Not: Learning to Forget in Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 297
  7. 2020Approximate Data Deletion from Machine Learning Modelscited by 250
  8. 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 218
  9. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
  10. 2018CurriculumNet: Weakly Supervised Learning from Large-Scale Web Imagescited by 126
  11. 2020Do We Need Zero Training Loss After Achieving Zero Training Error?cited by 61
  12. 2020Self-PU: Self Boosted and Calibrated Positive-Unlabeled Trainingcited by 47
  13. 2018Classification from Positive, Unlabeled and Biased Negative Datacited by 34
  14. 2016Crowdsourcing in Computer Visioncited by 31

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 7.

12 papers.