mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Randomized Antipodal Search Done Right for Data Pareto Improvement of LLM Unlearning

arXiv 2604.16591 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) sometimes memorize undesirable knowledge, which must be removed after deployment. Prior work on machine unlearning has focused largely on optimization methods that adjust parameters to enforce forgetting while preserving retention. However, these approaches assume that the forget and retain sets are readily available, which rarely holds in practice. Unlearning is typically triggered by an undesired generation at inference time, making the retrieval of relevant data the central challenge. We introduce the notion of data Pareto improvement for LLM unlearning, which formalizes how retrieval can expand the achievable trade-off frontier between forgetting and retention. To realize this principle, we propose Randomized Antipodal Search on Linearized Influence Kernel (RASLIK), a retrieval algorithm that combines permutation-projection hashing with randomized antipodal search. RASLIK reduces selection variance, achieves sublinear complexity, and yields a double gain in both quality and efficiency. Across multiple models, datasets, and unlearning algorithms, RASLIK consistently outperforms deterministic baselines and even oracle sampling, establishing randomized search as a principled and scalable solution for data-centric unlearning.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 34 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2026.

Builds on

34 of 49 references.

Closest ancestors · 14

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning9 Oct
  2. 2024Intrinsic Test of Unlearning Using Parametric Knowledge Traces17 Jun
  3. 2024RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models16 Jun
  4. 2024Reversing the Forget-Retain Objectives: An Efficient LLM Unlearning Framework from Logit Difference12 Jun
  5. 2024Decoupling the Class Label and the Target Concept in Machine Unlearning12 Jun
  6. 2024Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted Prompts12 Jun
  7. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
  8. 2024Machine Unlearning of Pre-trained Large Language Models23 Feb
  9. 2024Towards Safer Large Language Models through Machine Unlearning15 Feb
  10. 2024UNDIAL: Self-Distillation with Adjusted Logits for Robust Unlearning in Large Language Models15 Feb
  11. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  12. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct
2 more
  1. 2022Quark: Controllable Text Generation with Reinforced Unlearning26 May
  2. 2022Continual Learning and Private Unlearning24 Mar

Other references · 20

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  6. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  7. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  8. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  9. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  10. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
  11. 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
  12. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
8 more
  1. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
  2. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
  3. 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 252
  4. 2018Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networkscited by 187
  5. 2019Efficient Task-Specific Data Valuation for Nearest Neighbor Algorithmscited by 148
  6. 2024Token-wise Influential Training Data Retrieval for Large Language Modelscited by 20
  7. 2025ALinFiK: Learning to Approximate Linearized Future Influence Kernel for Scalable Third-Party LLM Data Valuationcited by 7
  8. 2026Influential Training Data Retrieval for Explaining Verbalized Confidence of LLMscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Domains to Instances: Dual-Granularity Data Synthesis for LLM Unlearning
  2. 2024UnStar: Unlearning with Self-Taught Anti-Sample Reasoning for LLMs
  3. 2026Learning What to Forget: Distributional Unlearning for LLM Representation Spaces
  4. 2025Forgetting-MarI: LLM Unlearning via Marginal Information Regularization
  5. 2025SoK: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models
  6. 2025Unlearning Isn't Deletion: Investigating Reversibility of Machine Unlearning in LLMs
  7. 2025BLUR: A Benchmark for LLM Unlearning Robust to Forget-Retain Overlap
  8. 2025LLM Unlearning using Gradient Ratio-Based Influence Estimation and Noise Injection