Loss Gradient Gaussian Width based Generalization and Optimization Guarantees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generalization and optimization guarantees on the population loss often rely on uniform convergence based analysis, typically based on the Rademacher complexity of the predictors. The rich representation power of modern models has led to concerns about this approach. In this paper, we present generalization and optimization guarantees in terms of the complexity of the gradients, as measured by the Loss Gradient Gaussian Width (LGGW). First, we introduce generalization guarantees directly in terms of the LGGW under a flexible gradient domination condition, which includes the popular PL (Polyak-Lojasiewicz) condition as a special case. Second, we show that sample reuse in iterative gradient descent does not make the empirical gradients deviate from the population gradients as long as the LGGW is small. Third, focusing on deep networks, we bound their single-sample LGGW in terms of the Gaussian width of the featurizer, i.e., the output of the last-but-one layer. To our knowledge, our generalization and optimization guarantees in terms of LGGW are the first results of its kind, and hold considerable promise towards quantitatively tight bounds for deep models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2024.
Builds on
51 of 86 references.
References · 51
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
- 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
- 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
- 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
- 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
38 more
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
- 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
- 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 391
- 2020Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Modelscited by 302
- 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 291
- 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 289
- 2019An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Densitycited by 289
- 2020The Risks of Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 262
- 2020Loss landscapes and optimization in over-parameterized non-linear systems and neural networkscited by 231
- 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 223
- 2018Gradient Descent Happens in a Tiny Subspacecited by 208
- 2020FetchSGD: Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Sketchingcited by 178
- 2017The Power of Interpolation: Understanding the Effectiveness of SGD in Modern Over-parametrized Learningcited by 150
- 2016A vector-contraction inequality for Rademacher complexitiescited by 141
- 2018Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimizes Over-parameterized Deep ReLU Networkscited by 139
- 2020On the linearity of large non-linear models: when and why the tangent kernel is constantcited by 129
- 2014Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization: Efficient Algorithms and Tight Error Boundscited by 104
- 2014Preserving Statistical Validity in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 102
- 2016The Landscape of Empirical Risk for Non-convex Lossescited by 86
- 2019Communication-efficient distributed SGD with Sketchingcited by 81
- 2015Generalization in Adaptive Data Analysis and Holdout Reusecited by 76
- 2019Measurements of Three-Level Hierarchical Structure in the Outliers in the Spectrum of Deepnet Hessianscited by 68
- 2018Random Shuffling Beats SGD after Finite Epochscited by 66
- 2019How Good is SGD with Random Shuffling?cited by 63
- 2020Closing the convergence gap of SGD without replacementcited by 56
- 2020Dissecting Hessian: Understanding Common Structure of Hessian in Neural Networkscited by 45
- 2019In Defense of Uniform Convergence: Generalization via derandomization with an application to interpolating predictorscited by 44
- 2018Uniform Convergence of Gradients for Non-Convex Learning and Optimizationcited by 38
- 2023Sharpness-Aware Minimization Leads to Low-Rank Featurescited by 38
- 2019Hessian based analysis of SGD for Deep Nets: Dynamics and Generalizationcited by 37
- 2019A New Analysis of Differential Privacy's Generalization Guaranteescited by 36
- 2014Interactive Fingerprinting Codes and the Hardness of Preventing False Discoverycited by 35
- 2018Graphical Convergence of Subgradients in Nonconvex Optimization and Learningcited by 17
- 2022On the Power-Law Hessian Spectrums in Deep Learningcited by 14
- 2022Thinking Outside the Ball: Optimal Learning with Gradient Descent for Generalized Linear Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 7
- 2022Restricted Strong Convexity of Deep Learning Models with Smooth Activationscited by 7
- 2014An Inequality with Applications to Structured Sparsity and Multitask Dictionary Learningcited by 5
- 2016Bounds for Vector-Valued Function Estimationcited by 3
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.