mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Algorithms for learning value-aligned policies considering admissibility relaxation

arXiv 2406.04838 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2024cs.AI cs.CY cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

The emerging field of value awareness engineering claims that software agents and systems should be value-aware, i.e. they must make decisions in accordance with human values. In this context, such agents must be capable of explicitly reasoning as to how far different courses of action are aligned with these values. For this purpose, values are often modelled as preferences over states or actions, which are then aggregated to determine the sequences of actions that are maximally aligned with a certain value. Recently, additional value admissibility constraints at this level have been considered as well. However, often relaxed versions of these constraints are needed, and this increases considerably the complexity of computing value-aligned policies. To obtain efficient algorithms that make value-aligned decisions considering admissibility relaxation, we propose the use of learning techniques, in particular, we have used constrained reinforcement learning algorithms. In this paper, we present two algorithms, ε-ADQL for strategies based on local alignment and its extension ε-CADQL for a sequence of decisions. We have validated their efficiency in a water distribution problem in a drought scenario.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 5 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2024.

Builds on

5 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021Value alignment: a formal approach18 Oct

Other references · 4

  1. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  2. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
  3. 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 237
  4. 2023Value Engineering for Autonomous Agentscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Specification Trap: Why Static Value Alignment Alone Is Insufficient for Robust Alignment
  2. 2026Latent Representation Alignment for Offline Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026Horizon Adaptive Offline Policy Learning via Value Stitching
  4. 2026Unifying Value Alignment and Assignment in Cross-Domain Offline Reinforcement Learning with Heterogeneous Datasets
  5. 2020Value Alignment Equilibrium in Multiagent Systems
  6. 2021MORAL: Aligning AI with Human Norms through Multi-Objective Reinforced Active Learning
  7. 2026DFPO: Scaling Value Modeling via Distributional Flow towards Robust and Generalizable LLM Post-Training
  8. 2026Fragility of Value under Imperfect Alignment