Value Alignment Equilibrium in Multiagent Systems
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment
Abstract (arXiv)
Value alignment has emerged in recent years as a basic principle to produce beneficial and mindful Artificial Intelligence systems. It mainly states that autonomous entities should behave in a way that is aligned with our human values. In this work, we summarize a previously developed model that considers values as preferences over states of the world and defines alignment between the governing norms and the values. We provide a use-case for this framework with the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma model, which we use to exemplify the definitions we review. We take advantage of this use-case to introduce new concepts to be integrated with the established framework: alignment equilibrium and Pareto optimal alignment. These are inspired on the classical Nash equilibrium and Pareto optimality, but are designed to account for any value we wish to model in the system.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 0 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2020.
Builds on
0 of 19 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2021Value alignment: a formal approach
- 2023Multi-Value Alignment in Normative Multi-Agent System: An Evolutionary Optimisation Approach
- 2023Multi-Value Alignment in Normative Multi-Agent System: Evolutionary Optimisation Approach
- 2025Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives
- 2024Beyond Preferences in AI Alignment
- 2025The Coming Crisis of Multi-Agent Misalignment: AI Alignment Must Be a Dynamic and Social Process
- 2025Emergent Alignment via Competition
- 2024Moral Alignment for LLM Agents