Explainability and Hate Speech: Structured Explanations Make Social Media Moderators Faster
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Content moderators play a key role in keeping the conversation on social media healthy. While the high volume of content they need to judge represents a bottleneck to the moderation pipeline, no studies have explored how models could support them to make faster decisions. There is, by now, a vast body of research into detecting hate speech, sometimes explicitly motivated by a desire to help improve content moderation, but published research using real content moderators is scarce. In this work we investigate the effect of explanations on the speed of real-world moderators. Our experiments show that while generic explanations do not affect their speed and are often ignored, structured explanations lower moderators' decision making time by 7.4%.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2024.
Builds on
13 of 22 references.
References · 13
- 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 407
- 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 380
- 2021Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotationscited by 314
- 2020Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detectioncited by 221
- 2021Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speechcited by 217
- 2021MultiVerS: Improving scientific claim verification with weak supervision and full-document contextcited by 143
- 2019Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysiscited by 133
- 2023SemEval-2023 Task 10: Explainable Detection of Online Sexismcited by 48
- 2023Evaluating GPT-3 Generated Explanations for Hateful Content Moderationcited by 46
- 2019Tackling Online Abuse: A Survey of Automated Abuse Detection Methodscited by 33
- 2022Explainable Abuse Detection as Intent Classification and Slot Fillingcited by 11
- 2021Cross-Policy Compliance Detection via Question Answeringcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2025ExPO-HM: Learning to Explain-then-Detect for Hateful Meme Detectioncited by 8
- 2025Compositional Generalisation for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 1
- 2026The Enforcement and Feasibility of Hate Speech Moderationcited by 1
- 2025SMARTER: A Data-efficient Framework to Improve Toxicity Detection with Explanation via Self-augmenting Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026HateXScore: A Metric Suite for Evaluating Reasoning Quality in Hate Speech Explanationscited by 0
- 2026Hate Speech Detection in Turkish and Arabic: A Comprehensive Studycited by 0
- 2026Controllable Multi-label Video Safety Detection via Adaptive Tversky Policy Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Controllable Multi-label Video Safety Detection via Adaptive Tversky Policy Optimization1 Oct 2026
- 2026Hate Speech Detection in Turkish and Arabic: A Comprehensive Study30 Jun 2026
- 2026The Enforcement and Feasibility of Hate Speech Moderation14 Apr 2026
- 2026HateXScore: A Metric Suite for Evaluating Reasoning Quality in Hate Speech Explanations20 Jan 2026
- 2025ExPO-HM: Learning to Explain-then-Detect for Hateful Meme Detection8 Oct 2025
- 2025SMARTER: A Data-efficient Framework to Improve Toxicity Detection with Explanation via Self-augmenting Large Language Models18 Sep 2025
- 2025Compositional Generalisation for Explainable Hate Speech Detection4 Jun 2025