Shaping History: Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for the Analysis and Dating of Cuneiform Tablets over Three Millennia
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cuneiform tablets, emerging in ancient Mesopotamia around the late fourth millennium BCE, represent one of humanity's earliest writing systems. Characterized by wedge-shaped marks on clay tablets, these artifacts provided insight into Mesopotamian civilization across various domains. Traditionally, the analysis and dating of these tablets rely on subjective assessment of shape and writing style, leading to uncertainties in pinpointing their exact temporal origins. Recent advances in digitization have revolutionized the study of cuneiform by enhancing accessibility and analytical capabilities. Our research uniquely focuses on the silhouette of tablets as significant indicators of their historical periods, diverging from most studies that concentrate on textual content. Utilizing an unprecedented dataset of over 94,000 images from the Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative collection, we apply deep learning methods to classify cuneiform tablets, covering over 3,000 years of history. By leveraging statistical, computational techniques, and generative modeling through Variational Auto-Encoders (VAEs), we achieve substantial advancements in the automatic classification of these ancient documents, focusing on the tablets' silhouettes as key predictors. Our classification approach begins with a Decision Tree using height-to-width ratios and culminates with a ResNet50 model, achieving a 61% macro F1-score for tablet silhouettes. Moreover, we introduce novel VAE-powered tools to enhance explainability and enable researchers to explore changes in tablet shapes across different eras and genres. This research contributes to document analysis and diplomatics by demonstrating the value of large-scale data analysis combined with statistical methods. These insights offer valuable tools for historians and epigraphists, enriching our understanding of cuneiform tablets and the cultures that produced them.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 109 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2024.
Builds on
42 of 109 references.
References · 42
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,005
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
30 more
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,736
- 2021GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 3,595
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2021Cascaded Diffusion Models for High Fidelity Image Generationcited by 1,155
- 2020NVAE: A Deep Hierarchical Variational Autoencodercited by 635
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
- 2021Tackling the Generative Learning Trilemma with Denoising Diffusion GANscited by 515
- 2016Tutorial on Variational Autoencoderscited by 404
- 2018Understanding disentangling in β-VAEcited by 332
- 2020StyleSpace Analysis: Disentangled Controls for StyleGAN Image Generationcited by 331
- 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 303
- 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 294
- 2020Metrics for Multi-Class Classification: an Overviewcited by 140
- 2021Transparency of Deep Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: A Review of Interpretability Methodscited by 83
- 2019explAIner: A Visual Analytics Framework for Interactive and Explainable Machine Learningcited by 69
- 2020Learning identifiable and interpretable latent models of high-dimensional neural activity using pi-VAEcited by 48
- 2021Using StyleGAN for Visual Interpretability of Deep Learning Models on Medical Imagescited by 35
- 2017Application of generative autoencoder in de novo molecular designcited by 32
- 2019Global and Local Interpretability for Cardiac MRI Classificationcited by 29
- 2020An Explainable Machine Learning Model for Early Detection of Parkinson's Disease using LIME on DaTscan Imagerycited by 25
- 2019Explainable Anatomical Shape Analysis through Deep Hierarchical Generative Modelscited by 18
- 2018Recognizing Cuneiform Signs Using Graph Based Methodscited by 14
- 2020Restoration of Fragmentary Babylonian Texts Using Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2022What's in a Decade? Transforming Faces Through Timecited by 9
- 2019c-Eval: A Unified Metric to Evaluate Feature-based Explanations via Perturbationcited by 7
- 2022Deep learning classification of large-scale point clouds: A case study on cuneiform tabletscited by 7
- 2020VAE-LIME: Deep Generative Model Based Approach for Local Data-Driven Model Interpretability Applied to the Ironmaking Industrycited by 3
- 2022Unsupervised Clustering of Roman Potsherds via Variational Autoencoderscited by 3
- 2020Investigating Machine Learning Methods for Language and Dialect Identification of Cuneiform Textscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.