On the Fairness ROAD: Robust Optimization for Adversarial Debiasing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the field of algorithmic fairness, significant attention has been put on group fairness criteria, such as Demographic Parity and Equalized Odds. Nevertheless, these objectives, measured as global averages, have raised concerns about persistent local disparities between sensitive groups. In this work, we address the problem of local fairness, which ensures that the predictor is unbiased not only in terms of expectations over the whole population, but also within any subregion of the feature space, unknown at training time. To enforce this objective, we introduce ROAD, a novel approach that leverages the Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO) framework within a fair adversarial learning objective, where an adversary tries to infer the sensitive attribute from the predictions. Using an instance-level re-weighting strategy, ROAD is designed to prioritize inputs that are likely to be locally unfair, i.e. where the adversary faces the least difficulty in reconstructing the sensitive attribute. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method: it achieves Pareto dominance with respect to local fairness and accuracy for a given global fairness level across three standard datasets, and also enhances fairness generalization under distribution shift.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2023.
Builds on
19 of 33 references.
References · 19
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
- 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 334
- 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
- 2020Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AIcited by 81
- 2020Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected Groupscited by 78
- 2020Robust Fairness under Covariate Shiftcited by 58
- 2021Sample Selection for Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 48
- 2020A Distributionally Robust Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 43
7 more
- 2023The Unfairness of Fair Machine Learning: Levelling down and strict egalitarianism by defaultcited by 36
- 2020Ensuring Fairness Beyond the Training Datacited by 35
- 2019Fair Adversarial Gradient Tree Boostingcited by 17
- 2021Investigating Trade-offs in Utility, Fairness and Differential Privacy in Neural Networkscited by 17
- 2022Distributionally Robust Models with Parametric Likelihood Ratioscited by 17
- 2022How Robust is Your Fairness? Evaluating and Sustaining Fairness under Unseen Distribution Shiftscited by 11
- 2021Wasserstein Robust Classification with Fairness Constraintscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.