Towards Threshold Invariant Fair Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Effective machine learning models can automatically learn useful information from a large quantity of data and provide decisions in a high accuracy. These models may, however, lead to unfair predictions in certain sense among the population groups of interest, where the grouping is based on such sensitive attributes as race and gender. Various fairness definitions, such as demographic parity and equalized odds, were proposed in prior art to ensure that decisions guided by the machine learning models are equitable. Unfortunately, the "fair" model trained with these fairness definitions is threshold sensitive, i.e., the condition of fairness may no longer hold true when tuning the decision threshold. This paper introduces the notion of threshold invariant fairness, which enforces equitable performances across different groups independent of the decision threshold. To achieve this goal, this paper proposes to equalize the risk distributions among the groups via two approximation methods. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed methodology is effective to alleviate the threshold sensitivity in machine learning models designed to achieve fairness.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2022Towards Intersectionality in Machine Learning: Including More Identities, Handling Underrepresentation, and Performing Evaluationcited by 59
- 2021Directional Bias Amplificationcited by 54
- 2022CAT: Controllable Attribute Translation for Fair Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 6
- 2023Towards Fairness in Personalized Ads Using Impression Variance Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2023Retiring DeltaDP: New Distribution-Level Metrics for Demographic Paritycited by 4
- 2024On the Maximal Local Disparity of Fairness-Aware Classifierscited by 3
- 2023A Canonical Data Transformation for Achieving Inter- and Within-group Fairnesscited by 1
- 2024Toward Fairness via Maximum Mean Discrepancy Regularization on Logits Spacecited by 0
- 2024Balancing Fairness and Accuracy in Data-Restricted Binary Classificationcited by 0
- 2025A Critical Review of Predominant Bias in Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Toward Calibrated, Fair, and accurate Deepfake Detectioncited by 0
- 2026RECAST: Model Reconstruction via Counterfactual-Aware Wasserstein Geometry under Limited Datacited by 0
- 2026RECAST: Model Reconstruction via Counterfactual-Aware Wasserstein Geometry under Limited Data26 Jun 2026
- 2026Toward Calibrated, Fair, and accurate Deepfake Detection3 Jun 2026
- 2025A Critical Review of Predominant Bias in Neural Networks16 Feb 2025
- 2024On the Maximal Local Disparity of Fairness-Aware Classifiers5 Jun 2024
- 2024Balancing Fairness and Accuracy in Data-Restricted Binary Classification12 Mar 2024
- 2024Toward Fairness via Maximum Mean Discrepancy Regularization on Logits Space20 Feb 2024
- 2023A Canonical Data Transformation for Achieving Inter- and Within-group Fairness23 Oct 2023
- 2023Towards Fairness in Personalized Ads Using Impression Variance Aware Reinforcement Learning5 Jun 2023
- 2023Retiring DeltaDP: New Distribution-Level Metrics for Demographic Parity31 Jan 2023
- 2022CAT: Controllable Attribute Translation for Fair Facial Attribute Classification14 Sep 2022
- 2022Towards Intersectionality in Machine Learning: Including More Identities, Handling Underrepresentation, and Performing Evaluation10 May 2022
- 2021Directional Bias Amplification24 Feb 2021