mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Probing the Category of Verbal Aspect in Transformer Language Models

arXiv 2406.02335 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate how pretrained language models (PLM) encode the grammatical category of verbal aspect in Russian. Encoding of aspect in transformer LMs has not been studied previously in any language. A particular challenge is posed by "alternative contexts": where either the perfective or the imperfective aspect is suitable grammatically and semantically. We perform probing using BERT and RoBERTa on alternative and non-alternative contexts. First, we assess the models' performance on aspect prediction, via behavioral probing. Next, we examine the models' performance when their contextual representations are substituted with counterfactual representations, via causal probing. These counterfactuals alter the value of the "boundedness" feature--a semantic feature, which characterizes the action in the context. Experiments show that BERT and RoBERTa do encode aspect--mostly in their final layers. The counterfactual interventions affect perfective and imperfective in opposite ways, which is consistent with grammar: perfective is positively affected by adding the meaning of boundedness, and vice versa. The practical implications of our probing results are that fine-tuning only the last layers of BERT on predicting aspect is faster and more effective than fine-tuning the whole model. The model has high predictive uncertainty about aspect in alternative contexts, which tend to lack explicit hints about the boundedness of the described action.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2024.

Builds on

44 of 67 references.

References · 44

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  4. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  5. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
  6. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
  7. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
  8. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
  9. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
  10. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 439
  11. 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 438
  12. 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 422
32 more
  1. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 354
  2. 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 242
  3. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 232
  4. 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
  5. 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 213
  6. 2020Causal Mediation Analysis for Interpreting Neural NLP: The Case of Gender Biascited by 191
  7. 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 151
  8. 2021Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language Modelscited by 131
  9. 2018What Is One Grain of Sand in the Desert? Analyzing Individual Neurons in Deep NLP Modelscited by 124
  10. 2020Perturbed Masking: Parameter-free Probing for Analyzing and Interpreting BERTcited by 109
  11. 2018Under the Hood: Using Diagnostic Classifiers to Investigate and Improve how Language Models Track Agreement Informationcited by 97
  12. 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
  13. 2021Conditional probing: measuring usable information beyond a baselinecited by 62
  14. 2021Counterfactual Interventions Reveal the Causal Effect of Relative Clause Representations on Agreement Predictioncited by 59
  15. 2022Probing for the Usage of Grammatical Numbercited by 59
  16. 2020Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Evaluation of Word Prediction Modelscited by 55
  17. 2021Refining Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 41
  18. 2022Probing Classifiers are Unreliable for Concept Removal and Detectioncited by 41
  19. 2020A Tale of a Probe and a Parsercited by 40
  20. 2019Studying the Inductive Biases of RNNs with Synthetic Variations of Natural Languagescited by 37
  21. 2020Can neural networks acquire a structural bias from raw linguistic data?cited by 35
  22. 2022The Better Your Syntax, the Better Your Semantics? Probing Pretrained Language Models for the English Comparative Correlativecited by 35
  23. 2020Investigating Transferability in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 28
  24. 2015Morphological Analyzer and Generator for Russian and Ukrainian Languagescited by 25
  25. 2022Naturalistic Causal Probing for Morpho-Syntaxcited by 19
  26. 2022Does BERT really agree ? Fine-grained Analysis of Lexical Dependence on a Syntactic Taskcited by 13
  27. 2023Gaussian Process Probes (GPP) for Uncertainty-Aware Probingcited by 11
  28. 2022Assessing the Capacity of Transformer to Abstract Syntactic Representations: A Contrastive Analysis Based on Long-distance Agreementcited by 7
  29. 2023Empowering Cross-lingual Behavioral Testing of NLP Models with Typological Featurescited by 6
  30. 2023Interventional Probing in High Dimensions: An NLI Case Studycited by 5
  31. 2022Reconstruction Probingcited by 2
  32. 2023Reanalyzing L2 Preposition Learning with Bayesian Mixed Effects and a Pretrained Language Modelcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

5 papers.