mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interventional Probing in High Dimensions: An NLI Case Study

arXiv 2304.10346 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2023cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Probing strategies have been shown to detect the presence of various linguistic features in large language models; in particular, semantic features intermediate to the "natural logic" fragment of the Natural Language Inference task (NLI). In the case of natural logic, the relation between the intermediate features and the entailment label is explicitly known: as such, this provides a ripe setting for interventional studies on the NLI models' representations, allowing for stronger causal conjectures and a deeper critical analysis of interventional probing methods. In this work, we carry out new and existing representation-level interventions to investigate the effect of these semantic features on NLI classification: we perform amnesic probing (which removes features as directed by learned linear probes) and introduce the mnestic probing variation (which forgets all dimensions except the probe-selected ones). Furthermore, we delve into the limitations of these methods and outline some pitfalls have been obscuring the effectivity of interventional probing studies.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2023.

Builds on

24 of 31 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  4. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  5. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  6. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  7. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  8. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
  9. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
  10. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 442
  11. 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 401
  12. 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 276
12 more
  1. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 230
  2. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 204
  3. 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 144
  4. 2019Explaining Classifiers with Causal Concept Effect (CaCE)cited by 135
  5. 2020CausaLM: Causal Model Explanation Through Counterfactual Language Modelscited by 117
  6. 2018Under the Hood: Using Diagnostic Classifiers to Investigate and Improve how Language Models Track Agreement Informationcited by 97
  7. 2021Meaningfully Debugging Model Mistakes using Conceptual Counterfactual Explanationscited by 53
  8. 2019HELP: A Dataset for Identifying Shortcomings of Neural Models in Monotonicity Reasoningcited by 35
  9. 2020An information theoretic view on selecting linguistic probescited by 19
  10. 2021Latent Space Explanation by Interventioncited by 13
  11. 2021Supporting Context Monotonicity Abstractions in Neural NLI Modelscited by 5
  12. 2021Decomposing Natural Logic Inferences in Neural NLIcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.