mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Does BERT really agree ? Fine-grained Analysis of Lexical Dependence on a Syntactic Task

arXiv 2204.06889 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2022cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although transformer-based Neural Language Models demonstrate impressive performance on a variety of tasks, their generalization abilities are not well understood. They have been shown to perform strongly on subject-verb number agreement in a wide array of settings, suggesting that they learned to track syntactic dependencies during their training even without explicit supervision. In this paper, we examine the extent to which BERT is able to perform lexically-independent subject-verb number agreement (NA) on targeted syntactic templates. To do so, we disrupt the lexical patterns found in naturally occurring stimuli for each targeted structure in a novel fine-grained analysis of BERT's behavior. Our results on nonce sentences suggest that the model generalizes well for simple templates, but fails to perform lexically-independent syntactic generalization when as little as one attractor is present.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2022.

Builds on

6 of 11 references.

References · 6

  1. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 354
  2. 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 242
  3. 2019The emergence of number and syntax units in LSTM language modelscited by 94
  4. 2019Linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networkscited by 58
  5. 2021Refining Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 41
  6. 2019Does BERT agree? Evaluating knowledge of structure dependence through agreement relationscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.

13 papers.

Sort: