mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gaussian Process Probes (GPP) for Uncertainty-Aware Probing

arXiv 2305.18213 ↗First posted 29 May 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding which concepts models can and cannot represent has been fundamental to many tasks: from effective and responsible use of models to detecting out of distribution data. We introduce Gaussian process probes (GPP), a unified and simple framework for probing and measuring uncertainty about concepts represented by models. As a Bayesian extension of linear probing methods, GPP asks what kind of distribution over classifiers (of concepts) is induced by the model. This distribution can be used to measure both what the model represents and how confident the probe is about what the model represents. GPP can be applied to any pre-trained model with vector representations of inputs (e.g., activations). It does not require access to training data, gradients, or the architecture. We validate GPP on datasets containing both synthetic and real images. Our experiments show it can (1) probe a model's representations of concepts even with a very small number of examples, (2) accurately measure both epistemic uncertainty (how confident the probe is) and aleatory uncertainty (how fuzzy the concepts are to the model), and (3) detect out of distribution data using those uncertainty measures as well as classic methods do. By using Gaussian processes to expand what probing can offer, GPP provides a data-efficient, versatile and uncertainty-aware tool for understanding and evaluating the capabilities of machine learning models.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2023.

Builds on

23 of 36 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
  4. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  5. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  6. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
  7. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  8. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  9. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
  10. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  11. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  12. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
11 more
  1. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 230
  2. 2021A Simple Fix to Mahalanobis Distance for Improving Near-OOD Detectioncited by 206
  3. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 204
  4. 2017Max-value Entropy Search for Efficient Bayesian Optimizationcited by 202
  5. 2020A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraintscited by 153
  6. 2020Perturbed Masking: Parameter-free Probing for Analyzing and Interpreting BERTcited by 109
  7. 2022Plex: Towards Reliability using Pretrained Large Model Extensionscited by 102
  8. 2021Pre-trained Gaussian Processes for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 63
  9. 2021Conditional probing: measuring usable information beyond a baselinecited by 61
  10. 2022Probing for the Usage of Grammatical Numbercited by 57
  11. 2018Dirichlet-based Gaussian Processes for Large-scale Calibrated Classificationcited by 50

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

11 papers.