mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Investigating Calibration and Corruption Robustness of Post-hoc Pruned Perception CNNs: An Image Classification Benchmark Study

arXiv 2405.20876 ↗First posted 31 May 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in many computer vision tasks. However, high computational and storage demands hinder their deployment into resource-constrained environments, such as embedded devices. Model pruning helps to meet these restrictions by reducing the model size, while maintaining superior performance. Meanwhile, safety-critical applications pose more than just resource and performance constraints. In particular, predictions must not be overly confident, i.e., provide properly calibrated uncertainty estimations (proper uncertainty calibration), and CNNs must be robust against corruptions like naturally occurring input perturbations (natural corruption robustness). This work investigates the important trade-off between uncertainty calibration, natural corruption robustness, and performance for current state-of-research post-hoc CNN pruning techniques in the context of image classification tasks. Our study reveals that post-hoc pruning substantially improves the model's uncertainty calibration, performance, and natural corruption robustness, sparking hope for safe and robust embedded CNNs.Furthermore, uncertainty calibration and natural corruption robustness are not mutually exclusive targets under pruning, as evidenced by the improved safety aspects obtained by post-hoc unstructured pruning with increasing compression.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2024.

Builds on

49 of 62 references.

References · 49

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  6. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
  7. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  8. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  9. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  10. 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,129
  11. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
  12. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 802
37 more
  1. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  2. 2017Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 697
  3. 2017Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimmingcited by 673
  4. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 596
  5. 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 595
  6. 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 531
  7. 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 524
  8. 2020Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flowcited by 467
  9. 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
  10. 2018AMC: AutoML for Model Compression and Acceleration on Mobile Devicescited by 375
  11. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
  12. 2014Exploiting Linear Structure Within Convolutional Networks for Efficient Evaluationcited by 304
  13. 2016EIE: Efficient Inference Engine on Compressed Deep Neural Networkcited by 291
  14. 2021Pruning and Quantization for Deep Neural Network Acceleration: A Surveycited by 259
  15. 2018Why do deep convolutional networks generalize so poorly to small image transformations?cited by 198
  16. 2019What Do Compressed Deep Neural Networks Forget?cited by 164
  17. 2019Adversarially Robust Distillationcited by 124
  18. 2016Understanding How Image Quality Affects Deep Neural Networkscited by 118
  19. 2018Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Surface Variationscited by 99
  20. 2021A Comprehensive Taxonomy for Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Survey of Surveys on Methods and Conceptscited by 90
  21. 2019High Fidelity Video Prediction with Large Stochastic Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 88
  22. 2019CARS: Continuous Evolution for Efficient Neural Architecture Searchcited by 79
  23. 2018Sparse DNNs with Improved Adversarial Robustnesscited by 71
  24. 2019Model Compression with Adversarial Robustness: A Unified Optimization Frameworkcited by 71
  25. 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Model Quantization for Deep Neural Networks in Image Classificationcited by 64
  26. 2022Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Neural Network Pruningcited by 42
  27. 2020Safety Concerns and Mitigation Approaches Regarding the Use of Deep Learning in Safety-Critical Perception Taskscited by 31
  28. 2021Network Pruning That Matters: A Case Study on Retraining Variantscited by 25
  29. 2021On the Effect of Pruning on Adversarial Robustnesscited by 23
  30. 2023Unleashing Mask: Explore the Intrinsic Out-of-Distribution Detection Capabilitycited by 16
  31. 2018Towards Dependability Metrics for Neural Networkscited by 13
  32. 2021Sparse Deep Learning: A New Framework Immune to Local Traps and Miscalibrationcited by 7
  33. 2022Enabling Verification of Deep Neural Networks in Perception Tasks Using Fuzzy Logic and Concept Embeddingscited by 7
  34. 2020Strategy to Increase the Safety of a DNN-based Perception for HAD Systemscited by 5
  35. 2022Deadwooding: Robust Global Pruning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2
  36. 2023Pruning Compact ConvNets for Efficient Inferencecited by 2
  37. 2019Really should we pruning after model be totally trained? Pruning based on a small amount of trainingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.